Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)

On 02/11/2020 10:36, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> Just to be clear: /implementing/ that new type of nodes by 
> piggybacking the internal IRI type is perfectly fine, as long as the 
> implementation behaves in an interoperable way (i.e. it produces the 
> correct Turtle*, and refrains from producing bogus Turtle). But 
> specifying this interoperable behaviour is better achieved, I think, 
> through an extended abstract syntax and semantics.


Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2020 22:14:21 UTC