Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*

This is very nice Pierre-Antoine and I did an initial manual test with EYE
like for instance

$ eye --nope https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/tests/semantics/test001a.ttl
--entail https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/tests/semantics/test001r.ttl
gives
true.

The current results are:

all-identical-embedded-triples-are-the-same --> true.
bnodes-in-embedded-subject --> true.
bnodes-in-embedded-object --> true.
bnodes-in-embedded-subject-and-object --> true.
bnodes-in-embedded-subject-and-object-fail --> fail
same-bnode-same-embedded-term --> true.
different-bnodes-same-embedded-term --> true.
malformed-lireral --> error
malformed-lireral-bnode --> error
opaque-lireral --> true.

So only the last test is in disagreement with what is proposed :-)

Kind regards,
Jos

-- https://josd.github.io/ <http://josd.github.io/>


On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:31 PM Pierre-Antoine Champin <
pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> as per my action assigned on our last call [1], I pushed a first version
> of a test-suite. The first goal is to provide a set of concrete examples
> of how RDF* implementations are expected to behave. An HTML rendering of
> that test-suite is available here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/tests/semantics/manifest.html
>
> so that everyone can review, reference, and comment each of the test cases.
>
> If "entail" sounds esoteric to you, think of the 2nd graph in each test
> case as a SPARQL* ASK query, which is expected to return TRUE (or FALSE,
> in the case of "not entail").
>
> Coming next: a similar test suite for SPARQL*.
>
>    best
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/40
> <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/40>
>
>