- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:06:49 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Cc: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Message-ID: <44ca92b1-e3ab-1c6e-2e61-a36118d2f675@ercim.eu>
Precision: since probably many of us are attending ISWC this week, we propose to have the first call on the *13th* of November. On 02/11/2020 08:50, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > > Hi all, > > given the answers on the Doodle, we picked Friday 5pm (CET): > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=First+RDF%2A+weekly+call&iso=20201106T16&p1=%3A&ah=1 > > Dan, as the CG chair, do you know if we can get a Zoom room from from > W3C? Or do we need to manage on our own > > best > > On 13/10/2020 18:45, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> RDF* is gaining traction, with more and more implementations; but to >> avoid fragmentation, we need to build a consensus and a stable >> specification for it. >> >> To achieve this goal, Olaf and I have started drafting a Community >> Group report, which is available here: >> >> https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/ <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/> >> >> It is hosted on a github repo <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/> >> (linked from the report), which we can use to structure the >> discussion: feel free to submit issues or pull requests if you have >> suggestions or requests about the content of this report. >> >> Opening issues and discussions is good, but closing them with >> consensual resolutions is better ;-) We feel that asynchronous >> discussion alone will not get us there, so we propose to organize a >> weekly call to make decisions more efficiently. It would be great in >> particular if people having already implemented RDF* could >> participate, to give us feedback on what is possible or not, what >> works well and what does not. We invite anyone interested to fill in >> this Doodle poll: >> >> https://doodle.com/poll/vax2g6y3nh5ksxxr >> <https://doodle.com/poll/vax2g6y3nh5ksxxr> >> >> Please note that: >> >> * the actual dates are not relevant, only the day-of-week and >> timeslots (I chose dates after Europe and US switch to DST, to see >> how the timeslots align in the longer term, but we can start earlier >> if needed); >> >> * the timeslots are within working(ish) hours for both Europe and US, >> as it seems that most people on the mailing list are in these >> regions; sincere apologies for the others -- if you really want to >> participate but can not join on any of the proposed slot, let us know. >> >> Looking forward to your feedback, >> >> Pierre-Antoine & Olaf >>
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2020 18:06:55 UTC