Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs

On 11/29/20 7:42 PM, Patrick J Hayes wrote:
> I agree. When I first met the idea of RDF* I made this same point to Thomas, and we had some correspondence on the topic. I came to the conclusion that my expending effort towards the development of RDF* would be a waste of time. 
>
> Pat


+1


Kingsley

>
>> On Nov 29, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been thinking about the expressive power of RDF* related to the
>> expressive power of RDF, at least the versions of RDF* that have been proposed
>> so far.
>>
>> As far as I can tell anything that can be done in RDF* can be easily done in
>> RDF by using standard
>> RDF reification techniques, perhaps slightly modified (e.g., to account for
>> malformed literals), with extra properties linking to syntactic encodings to
>> achieve referential opacity.
>>
>> But named graphs are more expressive than RDF* in a certain sense, as named
>> graphs allow multiple "embedded" triples to be collected together.
>>
>>
>>
>> peter
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software   
Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers

Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
              http://kidehen.blogspot.com

Profile Pages:
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Web Identities (WebID):
Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
        : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this

Received on Monday, 30 November 2020 19:25:24 UTC