Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)

On 18/11/2020 14:07, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:

> As Peter pointed out in his reply, RDF* does not have any notion of 
> "triple token", only that of "triple type" (so to speak).
> 
> So the example above is not "meant to annotate all triple tokens", but 
> meant to annotate this one triple (type).

https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-rdf-graph

"RDF Term"

<<>> is adding a new kind of RDF term.

 Andy

Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 14:33:47 UTC