W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > November 2020

Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward)

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:25:43 +0100
To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Message-ID: <42321dd3-24ee-f560-d262-be775f19b45f@ercim.eu>
Hi all,

Sorry for a late notice:

today's call will be on 

I propose that we use the W3C IRC server (http://irc.w3.org/ 
<http://irc.w3.org/>) to minute the call, on channel #rdf-star

I am not entirely sure that Olaf will be able to join; if he is not 
here, I guess that will mean a shorter call, but at least I propose that 
we cover the tentative Agenda:

* round of introductions

* Issue #15: CG Report scope : document alternatives or only make one 
proposal? <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/15>

     - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/15 

* Issues tagged with 'help-wanted 


* Issue #22: Do you need referential opacity? 

     - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/22 


On 03/11/2020 19:06, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> Precision:
> since probably many of us are attending ISWC this week, we propose to 
> have the first call on the *13th* of November.
> On 02/11/2020 08:50, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> given the answers on the Doodle, we picked Friday 5pm (CET):
>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=First+RDF%2A+weekly+call&iso=20201106T16&p1=%3A&ah=1
>> Dan, as the CG chair, do you know if we can get a Zoom room from from 
>> W3C? Or do we need to manage on our own
>>   best
>> On 13/10/2020 18:45, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> RDF* is gaining traction, with more and more implementations; but to 
>>> avoid fragmentation, we need to build a consensus and a stable 
>>> specification for it.
>>> To achieve this goal, Olaf and I have started drafting a Community 
>>> Group report, which is available here:
>>> https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/ <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/>
>>> It is hosted on a github repo <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/> 
>>> (linked from the report), which we can use to structure the 
>>> discussion: feel free to submit issues or pull requests if you have 
>>> suggestions or requests about the content of this report.
>>> Opening issues and discussions is good, but closing them with 
>>> consensual resolutions is better ;-) We feel that asynchronous 
>>> discussion alone will not get us there, so we propose to organize a 
>>> weekly call to make decisions more efficiently. It would be great in 
>>> particular if people having already implemented RDF* could 
>>> participate, to give us feedback on what is possible or not, what 
>>> works well and what does not. We invite anyone interested to fill in 
>>> this Doodle poll:
>>> https://doodle.com/poll/vax2g6y3nh5ksxxr 
>>> <https://doodle.com/poll/vax2g6y3nh5ksxxr>
>>> Please note that:
>>> * the actual dates are not relevant, only the day-of-week and 
>>> timeslots (I chose dates after Europe and US switch to DST, to see 
>>> how the timeslots align in the longer term, but we can start earlier 
>>> if needed);
>>> * the timeslots are within working(ish) hours for both Europe and 
>>> US, as it seems that most people on the mailing list are in these 
>>> regions; sincere apologies for the others -- if you really want to 
>>> participate but can not join on any of the proposed slot, let us know.
>>> Looking forward to your feedback,
>>>     Pierre-Antoine & Olaf

Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 11:25:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 13 November 2020 11:25:50 UTC