Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward)

Hi all,

given the answers on the Doodle, we picked Friday 5pm (CET):

https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=First+RDF%2A+weekly+call&iso=20201106T16&p1=%3A&ah=1

Dan, as the CG chair, do you know if we can get a Zoom room from from
W3C? Or do we need to manage on our own

  best

On 13/10/2020 18:45, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> RDF* is gaining traction, with more and more implementations; but to
> avoid fragmentation, we need to build a consensus and a stable
> specification for it.
>
> To achieve this goal, Olaf and I have started drafting a Community
> Group report, which is available here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/
>
> It is hosted on a github repo <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/>
> (linked from the report), which we can use to structure the
> discussion: feel free to submit issues or pull requests if you have
> suggestions or requests about the content of this report.
>
> Opening issues and discussions is good, but closing them with
> consensual resolutions is better ;-) We feel that asynchronous
> discussion alone will not get us there, so we propose to organize a
> weekly call to make decisions more efficiently. It would be great in
> particular if people having already implemented RDF* could
> participate, to give us feedback on what is possible or not, what
> works well and what does not. We invite anyone interested to fill in
> this Doodle poll:
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/vax2g6y3nh5ksxxr
>
> Please note that:
>
> * the actual dates are not relevant, only the day-of-week and
> timeslots (I chose dates after Europe and US switch to DST, to see how
> the timeslots align in the longer term, but we can start earlier if
> needed);
>
> * the timeslots are within working(ish) hours for both Europe and US,
> as it seems that most people on the mailing list are in these regions;
> sincere apologies for the others -- if you really want to participate
> but can not join on any of the proposed slot, let us know.
>
> Looking forward to your feedback,
>
>     Pierre-Antoine & Olaf
>