- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:23:31 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Indeed https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/#dfn-triple states that RDF* triples are RDF* terms. As far as I can tell, though, this treatment is not part of the original RDF* papers. There are other ways to handle << >> syntax. For example, it could be handled in the same way as [] or collections in Turtle. peter On 11/18/20 9:33 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 18/11/2020 14:07, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > >> As Peter pointed out in his reply, RDF* does not have any notion of "triple >> token", only that of "triple type" (so to speak). >> >> So the example above is not "meant to annotate all triple tokens", but >> meant to annotate this one triple (type). > > https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-rdf-graph > > "RDF Term" > > <<>> is adding a new kind of RDF term. > > Andy >
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 15:23:46 UTC