W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > November 2020

Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:23:31 -0500
To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Message-ID: <11361026-efb7-1d07-0db9-f49ec1ae6337@gmail.com>
Indeed https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/#dfn-triple states that RDF* triples are
RDF* terms. 

As far as I can tell, though, this treatment is not part of the original RDF*
papers.  There are other ways to handle << >> syntax.  For example, it could
be handled in the same way as [] or collections in Turtle.


peter


On 11/18/20 9:33 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 18/11/2020 14:07, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>
>> As Peter pointed out in his reply, RDF* does not have any notion of "triple
>> token", only that of "triple type" (so to speak).
>>
>> So the example above is not "meant to annotate all triple tokens", but
>> meant to annotate this one triple (type).
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-rdf-graph
>
> "RDF Term"
>
> <<>> is adding a new kind of RDF term.
>
>     Andy
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 15:23:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 18 November 2020 15:23:47 UTC