- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:42:30 +0000
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Message-ID: <CAK-qy=53qiiFSi8zNG-Y1_vskciP5waw9dZapAq6X5dJWR8hOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 07:50, Pierre-Antoine Champin < pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu> wrote: > Hi all, > > given the answers on the Doodle, we picked Friday 5pm (CET): > > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=First+RDF%2A+weekly+call&iso=20201106T16&p1=%3A&ah=1 > > Dan, as the CG chair, do you know if we can get a Zoom room from from W3C? > Or do we need to manage on our own > I don't recall ever hearing of Zoom rooms from W3C but I may have missed something. If you can find any documentation that this is possible, I'd be happy to vouch for it! Dan > best > On 13/10/2020 18:45, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > > Hi all, > > RDF* is gaining traction, with more and more implementations; but to avoid > fragmentation, we need to build a consensus and a stable specification for > it. > > To achieve this goal, Olaf and I have started drafting a Community Group > report, which is available here: > > https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/ > > It is hosted on a github repo <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/> (linked > from the report), which we can use to structure the discussion: feel free > to submit issues or pull requests if you have suggestions or requests about > the content of this report. > > Opening issues and discussions is good, but closing them with consensual > resolutions is better ;-) We feel that asynchronous discussion alone will > not get us there, so we propose to organize a weekly call to make decisions > more efficiently. It would be great in particular if people having already > implemented RDF* could participate, to give us feedback on what is possible > or not, what works well and what does not. We invite anyone interested to > fill in this Doodle poll: > > https://doodle.com/poll/vax2g6y3nh5ksxxr > > Please note that: > > * the actual dates are not relevant, only the day-of-week and timeslots (I > chose dates after Europe and US switch to DST, to see how the timeslots > align in the longer term, but we can start earlier if needed); > > * the timeslots are within working(ish) hours for both Europe and US, as > it seems that most people on the mailing list are in these regions; sincere > apologies for the others -- if you really want to participate but can not > join on any of the proposed slot, let us know. > > Looking forward to your feedback, > > Pierre-Antoine & Olaf > >
Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 12:43:03 UTC