public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from January 2024 by author

Adrian Gschwend

• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Seeking consensus on RDF-star (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: A proposed methodology for seeking consensus (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Wednesday, 3 January)

Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 25 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Wednesday, 3 January)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Semantics TF call today? (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Atomic reification (Friday, 26 January)
• N-triple size (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: issues in rdf-test (Thursday, 25 January)
• Atomic reification (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Anecdote/implemention note Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: miniCore Re: MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Terminology definitions ; motivating example (Monday, 8 January)
• Terminology definitions ; motivating example (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Annotations associated only with occurrences? (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Monday, 1 January)
• Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Monday, 1 January)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Regrets for today's meeting (Thursday, 25 January)

ddooss@wp.pl

• Regrets for today's meeting (Thursday, 25 January)

Doerthe Arndt

• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)

Enrico Franconi (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star Triple-Edge subgroup meeting (Thursday, 11 January)

Franconi Enrico

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: The rationale of well-formed-ness (Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal) (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal (Tuesday, 23 January)
• [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Other comments to the sugar proposal (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Thursday, 4 January)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Monday, 1 January)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Anecdote/implemention note Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)

John Walker

• SPARQL DESCRIBE (Wednesday, 10 January)

Lassila, Ora

• Regrets (Thursday, 11 January)
• Special subgroup meeting (Thursday, 4 January)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: [External] : Seeking consensus on RDF-star (Thursday, 18 January)
• Adjusting the suggested RDF-star naming notation (Thursday, 18 January)
• A focus on reification (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: A proposed methodology for seeking consensus (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Selective Transparency of Claims (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Terminology definitions ; motivating example (Sunday, 7 January)
• Occurrences as Named Triples (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: Summary of the options on the table (Monday, 29 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: SPARQL DESCRIBE (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: RDFn (Thursday, 4 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Semantics TF call today? (Friday, 26 January)
• issues in rdf-test - new out-of-scope label (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Sunday, 21 January)
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Sunday, 21 January)
• syntactic sugar proposal (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: Seeking consensus on RDF-star (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Selective Transparency of Claims (Thursday, 11 January)
• RDFn (Thursday, 4 January)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: the "semantic sugar" approach (Wednesday, 31 January)
• the "semantic sugar" approach (Tuesday, 30 January)
• summary of the Semantics TF discussion of last friday (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Semantics TF call today? (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Summary of the options on the table (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: issues in rdf-test - new out-of-scope label (Thursday, 25 January)
• Summary of the options on the table (Thursday, 25 January)
• The rationale of well-formed-ness (Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal) (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Other comments to the sugar proposal (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: [External] : Seeking consensus on RDF-star (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 12 January)
• A proposed methodology for seeking consensus (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: graph terms vs nested triples (Thursday, 11 January)

Pierre-Antoine Champin (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star Triple-Edge subgroup meeting (Thursday, 11 January)

Sasaki, Felix

• AW: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Sunday, 21 January)

Souripriya Das

• Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? (Friday, 19 January)
• N-Triple should stay as a line-based subset of Turtle (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: [External] : Seeking consensus on RDF-star (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: RDFn (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: [External] : Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Thursday, 4 January)
• RDFn (simplified): Set of Triples and Set of Edges (Monday, 1 January)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: Special subgroup meeting (Friday, 5 January)

Thomas Lörtsch

• Re: Semantics TF call today? (Friday, 26 January)
• Streaming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: N-triple size (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Atomic reification (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Summary of the options on the table (Friday, 26 January)
• Streaming [was: Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity)] (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: miniCore Re: MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go (Friday, 12 January)
• miniCore Re: MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go (Friday, 12 January)
• MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Selective Transparency of Claims (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Terminology definitions ; motivating example (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version (Friday, 5 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 12:30:54 UTC