Re: Summary of the options on the table

Hi all,

Pierre-Antoine's summary table now also has a row that demonstrates the
SPARQL-related implications of each of the approaches (as per my
interpretation of the approaches).

https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.html


Best,
Olaf


On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 18:14 +0100, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> (resending to the correct mailing-list, sorry about the confusion)
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> 
> following last week's discussions (on Thursday and Friday), I tried
> to 
> collate the different options that are on the table. Their
> description 
> is scattered in many places (minutes, emails, documents and wiki
> pages 
> on github), so I tried to summarize them all in one document, with
> links 
> to what I consider are the more recent sources.
> 
> https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.html

>    (source: 
> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.md

> )
> 
> As can be seen, for each proposal, we have a relatively clear and
> stable 
> description of the corresponding abstract syntax and semantics. They
> are 
> aggressively summarized in this document, but the link to the source
> can 
> be used to access the more detailed description.
> 
> Hopefully, this synthetic document will help us discuss the 
> commonalities and differences between the different approaches, and
> help 
> each of us decide what they can and can not live with.
> 
>    pa
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 29 January 2024 11:22:15 UTC