Re: A proposed methodology for seeking consensus

• From: Adrian Gschwend <adrian.gschwend@zazuko.com>
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:33:24 +0100
• To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <731595c7-a8ce-4c86-b185-a8214a77cdf7@zazuko.com>

On 12.01.2024 08:59, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:

Hi Pierre-Antoine,

>  From the desired outcome, hopefully, we should be able to drive an 
> abstract syntax that satisfies them, and a semantics.

Thanks for summarizing the concerns from yesterday’s call.

I am fine with starting with concrete syntax if that helps.

Here are my thoughts:

Thread management: I agree that the current practice of having extensive 
email threads is no longer manageable. Most participants seemed to agree 
on this.

GitHub Markdown file approach: I suggest trying out the GitHub Markdown 
file approach at https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg. By avoiding a "one 
big file" strategy initially, we can facilitate direct comparisons and 
discussions on different proposals through pull requests and comments. 
This could streamline our collaborative process. And if not, we at least 
tried.


regards

Adrian

Received on Friday, 12 January 2024 09:33:35 UTC