- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:59:41 +0100
- To: RDF-star WG <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 12 January 2024 07:59:44 UTC
Hi all, the discussion from yesterday's meeting got me thinking quite a lot. In particular: * I share Andy's concern about convergence * I like what Gregg said about trying to build a common proposal rather than compare different proposal * I agree with Thomas that the less controversial point seems to be the concrete Turtle syntax * as many have repeated before, we should ground our design choices in use-cases So may be we should start from a proposal for the concrete syntax, and try to express our different use cases with this syntax. Then, for each use-case, we identify some SPARQL queries that could be exectued agains the UC data, and what would be the desirble outcome for that use case. Note that I we should come up with SELECT queries, but also ASK queries (the latter being a proxy for talking about simple entailment). From the desired outcome, hopefully, we should be able to drive an abstract syntax that satisfies them, and a semantics. Any thoughts? pa
Received on Friday, 12 January 2024 07:59:44 UTC