More on the 'legacy' namespacing question
title element, meta, h1 and rdfa
Feedback on RDFa Primer
testing for negative results (action from 30 Aug telecon)
[RDFa] meeting record: 2007-08-30 RDFa Task Force telecon
Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
[RDFa TC] New TC34 - TC36 for @src
RDFa actions in web browsers (UI)
Just for the records: the pyRdfa code URI
[ramm.x] Activity report & news ...
hAudio RDFa
RDFa serializer?
Interesting experience: my foaf in RDFa
- RE: Interesting experience: my foaf in RDFa
- Re: Interesting experience: my foaf in RDFa
- Re: Interesting experience: my foaf in RDFa
- RE: Interesting experience: my foaf in RDFa
ACTION: Steven to check test cases 29-33 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-rdfa-minutes.html#action09]
Agenda for Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
RDFa Javascript Bookmarklets updated
Minutes 16 August 2007
RDFa good practice Wiki page
Action item to outline language-dependent features
- Re: Action item to outline language-dependent features
Telecon Agenda - Thursday, 16 August 2007, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
@href and @resource
[RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer UPDATE
Regrets for 16 August
[RDFa Syntax] @resource and @href
[RDFa TC] Cleanup XHTML 1 partition
RDFa Syntax document migrated to XHTML 2 Working Group publication system
xhtml-rdfa updated
Issues to record
My pyRdfa via the Web
meeting record: 2007-08-09 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
- Re: Clarifying CURIEs [was Re: RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]]
Telecon today ...
question on the RDFa validation service...
RDFa - Dublin Core Metadata - [Fwd: Draft of revised version of Expressing DC in X/HTML meta/link elements]
The core processing step (was: Ben's rules:-)
Display values for RDFa object URLs
- RE: Display values for RDFa object URLs
- Re: Display values for RDFa object URLs
- Re: Display values for RDFa object URLs
- Re: Display values for RDFa object URLs
- Re: Display values for RDFa object URLs
- Re: Display values for RDFa object URLs
- Re: Display values for RDFa object URLs
hAudio RDFa implementation using Operator
Test 0029: error or not? I htink this is a test error...
Error in (approved) test 0010
Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
- RE: Error in (approved) test 0009
My no-longer pseudo code, the way I understand it:-)
- Re: My no-longer pseudo code, the way I understand it:-)
- Re: My no-longer pseudo code, the way I understand it:-)
[RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-08-02 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
[RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33
- Re: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33
- RE: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33
- RE: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33
- RE: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33
- Re: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33
- RE: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33