- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:22:35 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, eyal.oren@deri.org, Frédérick Giasson <fred@fgiasson.com>
Ivan Herman wrote: > > Dan Brickley wrote: >>> However, one thing _really_ bugs me: Our nice (X)HTML+RDFa documents are >>> ignored by 'Semantic Web search engines' as ptsw [2] or sindice [3]. >>> People, move on! >> Can I put in a vote for W3C to spend some effort on updating the RDF >> Validator (http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator)? I reckon that, alongside >> the syntax checker at validator.w3.org, will go a long way to pushing >> these developments out into wider usage. >> > > I am not sure what the current state of the problems are. My foaf.html > file validates! http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ARPServlet?URI=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ivan-herman.net%2Ffoaf.html&PARSE=Parse+URI%3A+&TRIPLES_AND_GRAPH=PRINT_TRIPLES&FORMAT=PNG_EMBED Error: Your document does not contain any RDF statement. "RDF Validator" vs "RDFa mode of validator.w3.org" confusion? I was talking about the one that extracts triples and draws pretty graphs... Dan
Received on Saturday, 25 August 2007 08:22:45 UTC