- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:48:28 +0200
- To: <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Cc: "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Martin, >This does >http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/ I *knew* Ivan is a good guy ;) Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Martin McEvoy [mailto:martin@weborganics.co.uk] >Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 1:38 AM >To: Hausenblas, Michael >Cc: W3C RDFa task force >Subject: RE: hAudio RDFa > >Hello Michael > >On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 21:17 +0200, Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> Martin, >> >> > The Question is, instead of using @instanceof I have used >> > @role in my container classes Is this OK? parts of a page do >> > perform roles so to speak (or at least thats my line of >> > thinking) and I am very new using RDFa, Microformats has >> > always been my "thing" so I'm not sure if the syntax is >> > correct ... >> >> @role or @class used to be in discussion for >> syntactic sugar of doing a shorthand for 'rdf:type'. >> >> IIRC we have not yet finally resolved this issue but we >> have a non-binding resolution [1] to call the magic attribute >> 'instanceof'. >> >> > ... I have extracted the RDF using Elias Torres [4] >> > transformation service and everything looks as it should So I >> > am guessing that things are fine. >> >> Unfortunately none of the RDFa extractors out there >> currently supports 'instanceof' AFAIK. >> Please, people, proof that I'm wrong ;) > >This does >http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/ > >> >> And again, just for clarity: No, it is NOT correct to >> use @role or @class, though the available implementations >> might eat it - *currently*. > >Thanks Michael for correcting me > >changed to @instanceof > >Martin >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] >> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007 Jul/0209. >> html >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Michael Hausenblas, MSc. >> Institute of Information Systems & Information Management >> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH >> Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org >> > [mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of >> > Martin McEvoy >> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 9:28 PM >> > To: W3C RDFa task force >> > Subject: hAudio RDFa >> > >> > >> > Hello all >> > >> > My name is Martin I have been exploring the possibilities of >> > hAudio RDFa and trying to get a live hAudio RDFa example [1] >> > together in the same way as I did when the hAudio Microformat >> > [2] was being developed, which so far is turning out pretty >> > good, the only thing that has changed from the original >> > hAudio RDFa proposal is I have added Album and Track Roles >> > which I have re-used from hAlbum [3] >> > >> > The Question is, instead of using @instanceof I have used >> > @role in my container classes Is this OK? parts of a page do >> > perform roles so to speak (or at least thats my line of >> > thinking) and I am very new using RDFa, Microformats has >> > always been my "thing" so I'm not sure if the syntax is >> > correct I have extracted the RDF using Elias Torres [4] >> > transformation service and everything looks as it should So I >> > am guessing that things are fine. >> > >> > Comments Advice is welcome >> > >> > Kind Regards >> > >> > Martin McEvoy >> > >> > [1] http://weborganics.co.uk/files/hAudio-RDFa.xhtml >> > [2] http://weborganics.co.uk/haudio >> > [3] http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal >> > [4] >> > http://torrez.us/services/rdfa/http://weborganics.co.uk/files/ >> > hAudio-RDFa.xhtml >> > >> > >> > >> > > >
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 07:47:33 UTC