Re: [RDFa TC] Review TC29 - 33

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>
> TC29:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/Test0029
>
> Proposal: on hold
>
> Need to clarify what we originally meant by this one. The title
> suggests something <meta>-ish, but indeed there is no <meta> in it.
> However, ccording to [1] the ASK query seems ok.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject

I think the only thing wrong here is the title of the test case. This
looks valid to me: we're testing that the markup gets stripped.

I would vote for Accept with title change.

-Ben

Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 08:07:38 UTC