- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:59:55 +0200
- To: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <46BC7D6B.2040208@w3.org>
Guys, I will disappear on vacations this week-end. Some minor issues that should formally added to our Issues' list, not to forget about them... ISSUE: what is the action if the value of @rel, @rev, @instanceof, @property are empty (ie, "")? My proposal: do not generate any triple ----------------------------------------- ISSUE: what is the action if the value of @rel, @rev, etc, are not namespace backed, ie, no ':' is included? Alt 1: do not generate any triple Alt 2: generate the triple in the xhtml namespace Alt 3: generate the triple in the xhtml namespace for the <link> and <meta> elements (for backward compatibility with HTML metadata notation) My Proposal: a preference for #3 Mark claims that this has already been resolved in the past; if so, forget about this, and put it on the account of me being careless:-) ----------------------------------------- ISSUE: should we accept @name as an alternative to @property for the <meta> element? Alt 1: yes, but a possible @property has a higher priority Alt 2: no Proposal: #1 (to ensure backward compatibility, so to say) Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 15:00:11 UTC