public-patcg@w3.org from February 2022 by subject

[admin] Meeting cadence (#2)

[admin] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3)

[admin] Review and improve security/privacy disclosure policy (#1)

[meetings] Add attribution-tradeoffs-goog.pdf slides (#24)

[meetings] Add IRC details to agenda (#27)

[meetings] Agenda Request - (#16)

[meetings] Agenda Request - PARAKEET / MaCAW / Masked LARK adoption in Chrome (#16)

[meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34)

[meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22)

[meetings] Can non-members attend meetings? (#21)

[meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7)

[meetings] Closed Pull Request: Adding Bucketization-Microsoft slides

[meetings] Consider recording meetings (#10)

[meetings] Creating a draft of the working agenda (#20)

[meetings] First pass at minutes (#31)

[meetings] January 2022 Meeting (#5)

[meetings] Mechanism for Meeting Minutes (#6)

[meetings] Meeting Cadence and Timing? (#4)

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add Aggregate API with PPM slides

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add attribution-tradeoffs-goog.pdf slides

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add IRC details to agenda

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Adding Bucketization-Microsoft slides

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Creating a draft of the working agenda

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Merge Proposal summaries and Masked LARk

[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Slides from Mozilla/Strategy presentation

[meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18)

[meetings] Private Measurement Review (#17)

[meetings] Publish agenda in advance with links to relevant information. (#13)

[meetings] Pull Request: Add Aggregate API with PPM slides

[meetings] Pull Request: Add attribution-tradeoffs-goog.pdf slides

[meetings] Pull Request: Add IRC details to agenda

[meetings] Pull Request: Adding Bucketization-Microsoft slides

[meetings] Pull Request: Creating a draft of the working agenda

[meetings] Pull Request: First pass at minutes

[meetings] Pull Request: Proposal summaries and lark

[meetings] Pull Request: Slides from Mozilla/Strategy presentation

[meetings] Schedule next meeting (#19)

[meetings] Secret ballots (#26)

[meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33)

[meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9)

[meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32)

[meetings] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#25)

[patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1)

[patcg.github.io] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#5)

[patcg.github.io] clarify deliverables of the group (#4)

[patcg.github.io] clarify scope is not just browser features (#3)

[patcg.github.io] notify the group via the mailing list (#2)

[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: clarify charter scope

[private-measurement] Collecting Privacy Measurement discussion topics centrally (#2)

[private-measurement] Feature Discussion: High Risk Contexts (#6)

[private-measurement] Generate Test Cases for Evaluations (#7)

[private-measurement] This space is not yet actively hooked up to the w3c listserv (#1)

[private-measurement] Utility vs Privacy for attribution proposals (#3)

[private-measurement] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#4)

[private-measurement] Why should attribution solutions default to on? (Default to on debate) (#5)

[proposals] Charter needs to allow for competitive solutions not exclusively controlled by browsers (#9)

[proposals] Collection of known research and literature on user perceptions of (novel) privacy enhancing technologies (#10)

[proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8)

[proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4)

[proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2)

[proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS

[proposals] Notice and consent debate (#5)

[proposals] Possible solutions debate (#7)

[proposals] Why are multi-party computation solutions the only ones that should be considered? (#7)

[proposals] Why should attribution solutions default to on? (#6)

[proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5)

[proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5)

Closed: [admin] Meeting cadence (#2)

Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Day 2 Q&A (#14)

Closed: [meetings] Call for Scribes - 2022-02 Meeting (#22)

Closed: [meetings] Consider recording meetings (#10)

Closed: [meetings] Mechanism for Meeting Minutes (#6)

Closed: [meetings] Private Measurement Review (#17)

Closed: [meetings] Secret ballots (#26)

Closed: [meetings] Should we already have a separate repo for discussing measurement? (#33)

Closed: [meetings] Take up Private Attribution Proposals (#9)

Closed: [private-measurement] Collecting Privacy Measurement discussion topics centrally (#2)

Closed: [private-measurement] This space is not yet actively hooked up to the w3c listserv (#1)

Closed: [proposals] Expansion on Delegation and Privacy Budget Tradeoffs (#8)

Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2022 23:31:23 UTC