- From: Brian May via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:00:46 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
> it's easier to analyze the proposals in terms of utility that each provides, without thinking too much about their privacy and security characteristics. Thanks, very helpful and I agree: let's be confident approaches provide sufficient utility that putting effort into understanding their security and privacy implications is worth doing. I think utility here is principally the satisfaction of use-cases, but also doing so at cost and complexity levels that are comfortable and sustainable for intended adopters. So I'm thinking something like the following order of evaluation: - What use-case(s) does the model address? - Can the model be deployed successfully by a majority of target adopters, either independently or through collaboration? - Are the resource requirements of operating the model sustainable for target adopters? - Can the model be implemented such that it does not create security threats? - Can the model be implemented such that it does not create privacy threats? -- GitHub Notification of comment by bmayd Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/25#issuecomment-1038303066 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 13 February 2022 18:00:48 UTC