- From: Robin Berjon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:14:06 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
James, this is not a "debate" not matter how much you may use tricks as you have in renaming the issue after the fact to try to create deceptive optics. The matter of whether notice and choice provides adequate protection is clear. This has been shown to you repeatedly. At no point have you provided the slightest shred of evidence to indicate otherwise. No one in this issue has challenged this fact, people have simply been discussing how that fact interacts with other aspects of the world and helped clarify the position. As always, if someone has new information relating to the effectiveness of notice and choice, it should be looked at. I would add that, as you have been told several times previously and as documented above, notice and choice regimes have noted anticompetitive effects. If you had a sincere interest in addressing competition issues, you would consider notice and choice as problematic. Privacy is the set of rules that govern flows of information. Bringing up "privacy absolutists" is a meaningless term that just serves to stir up FUD — which for the record I note is another the trolling tactic. -- GitHub Notification of comment by darobin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/5#issuecomment-1035584922 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2022 22:14:08 UTC