- From: Martin Thomson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:23:54 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
@alextcone, I just changed the name back (I agree that the discussion stopped making sense under James' new title). To @michaelkleber's question, the logic is simple: 1. Requirement: We want to design an aggregation system in which no single [malicious|compromised] party can get non-aggregated data 2. (Unstated requirements): the system produces useful information; the system does not cost inordinately much; etc.... 3. Analysis: MPC is most likely outcome. Like @eriktaubeneck, this isn't an absolute position, it's a prediction or even a guess about what is most likely to work. It's not saying that alternatives don't exist, but that they seem less likely to be able to address the requirement. -- GitHub Notification of comment by martinthomson Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/7#issuecomment-1035592648 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2022 22:23:56 UTC