- From: Robin Berjon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:34:27 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
There have been several bits and pieces of discussions that should get collected in the principles doc — might we impose on the chairs to set up the repo, since it's an accepted deliverable anyway? (cc @AramZS) To add one more dimension to the MPC solution space, it might be too difficult or too costly to obtain some properties through purely technical means (collusion-resistance, adversaries tougher than HbC). Conversely, a pure governance-based model might offer too few guarantees (even if trusted, having one big DB of all browsing activity is never an acceptable level of risk). But a hybrid model could use a governance model to provide non-collusion and honesty in support of an MPC system. @michael-oneill I wonder if a single entity in an EDPB-adequate jurisdiction could be enough to provide guarantees (assuming the entity were required to legally resist). But that's a thorny aspect that would require some pretty in-depth legal analysis. -- GitHub Notification of comment by darobin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/7#issuecomment-1036448808 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 11 February 2022 17:34:29 UTC