- From: Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 21:23:39 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
Hello all, after reviewing discussion here and talking through a structure with @seanturner we think that the best approach is to move in the direction discussed here. We'll have an introduction in our first meeting and a short period to go through work mode and review agenda (details soon to be entered into the Github repo) and will set into the agenda: *five* 30m slots with three on day 1 and two on day 2 and some flexibility in the schedule if we see additional folks stand up to speak to this. We would then follow this up on day 2 with 30m-1h to [review discussed constraints, conditions and comparisons](https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/17) to paraphrase @erik-anderson and @martinthomson here. (I will open up an issue to track that part of the agenda). I think we can look at 3 of the five slots taken by existing proposal authors - @benjaminsavage - @csharrison - @erik-anderson I believe that even though he is not a formal member of this group, @johnwilander will be in attendance as an expert observer and open to answering questions during a dedicated time slot, leaving 1 more time slot open. We can include @rmirisola's presentation of #12 or, if participants here feel that Prio and related concepts represent a unique enough approach perhaps @marianapr can talk through them with this group or suggest someone who would. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AramZS Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/9#issuecomment-1033075477 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2022 21:23:41 UTC