Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (#5)

By topic do you mean Topics API? In this case there's no question that personal data may be processed, and consent is needed. What I meant is actual privacy-preserving tech where no personal data is processed.

I agree with ePrivacy take, though. But it would be tough to decide who should ask about the consent, and where (on a website browsing? Why, if conversion//fetches happen later?) in context of Turtledove. So I'd like to highlight that this will be a big headache (and I know what I'm talking about here), because in terms of "consent" it is necessary to establish _WHO_ should get the consent.

My initial question was more generic, not aimed at any specific proposal.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by lknik
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/5#issuecomment-1034870786 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 10 February 2022 12:35:01 UTC