public-i18n-core@w3.org from January to March 2008 by date

Monday, 31 March 2008

• Re: Characters, entities and references Martin Duerst

Friday, 28 March 2008

• Re: Characters, entities and references Najib Tounsi
• Characters, entities and references Richard Ishida
• RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 5: H56 source text Richard Ishida
• RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 1: H34 example source direction Richard Ishida
• RE: [ssml11] Fifth WD of SSML 1.1 is published Richard Ishida

Thursday, 27 March 2008

• RE: Translation of i18n articles Richard Ishida

Tuesday, 25 March 2008

• FW: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft of December, 2007 Richard Ishida

Monday, 17 March 2008

• FWD: [Bug 3076] Normative ref to 1.0 or 1.1 datatypes Felix Sasaki

Friday, 14 March 2008

• Re: Tests updated and new results page Najib Tounsi
• Tests updated and new results page Richard Ishida

Thursday, 13 March 2008

• Re: i18n Core telecon minutes 2008-03-12 Najib Tounsi
• i18n Core telecon minutes 2008-03-12 Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

• agenda+ Should we drop xml-spec for our WG Notes? Richard Ishida

Friday, 7 March 2008

• Re: [UAX29] i18n comment 17: Search engines Addison Phillips
• Re: [UAX29] i18n comment 18: Scripts without spaces Addison Phillips
• Re: [UAX29] i18n comment 19: Word break algorithm Addison Phillips
• Re: [UAX29] i18n comment 8: Conjunct clusters Mark Davis
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 8: Conjunct clusters Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 1: Grapheme terminology Richard Ishida
• UAX29, Prepended characters Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 20: Carriage return typo Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 16: Where is 9b? Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 15: run-on sentence Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 14: a key feature are Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 12: Legacy vs. desired Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 11: for complete Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 10: Different types of grapheme cluster? Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 9: Types of grapheme clusters Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 8: Conjunct clusters Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 7: Hangul stacks Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 6: Indic scripts or Tamil? Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 5: Definition of EDGCs Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 4: Historically originally Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 3: Defining intended uses for grapheme clusters Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 2: Not just TLCJ Richard Ishida
• RE: [UAX29] i18n comment 1: Grapheme terminology Richard Ishida
• [UAX29] i18n comment 20: Carriage return typo ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 19: Word break algorithm ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 18: Scripts without spaces ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 16: Where is 9b? ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 17: Search engines ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 15: run-on sentence ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 14: a key feature are ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 12: Legacy vs. desired ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 11: for complete ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 10: Different types of grapheme cluster? ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 9: Types of grapheme clusters ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 8: Conjunct clusters ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 7: Hangul stacks ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 6: Indic scripts or Tamil? ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 5: Definition of EDGCs ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 4: Historically originally ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 3: Defining intended uses for grapheme clusters ishida@w3.org
• [UAX29] i18n comment 2: Not just TLCJ ishida@w3.org
• UAX 29 comments Richard Ishida
• [UAX29] i18n comment 1: Grapheme terminology ishida@w3.org

Wednesday, 5 March 2008

• Re: possible issue with LEIRI definition in draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt Martin Duerst

Tuesday, 4 March 2008

• possible issue with LEIRI definition in draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt Grosso, Paul

Monday, 3 March 2008

• Fwd: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Mark Davis
• RE: [HTML5] i18n comment 1: Rendering bidi without a style sheet Richard Ishida
• BOM and UTF-16LE/BE (was: Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML) Martin Duerst

Saturday, 1 March 2008

• Re: [HTML5] i18n comment 1: Rendering bidi without a style sheet Martin Duerst

Friday, 29 February 2008

• [HTML5] i18n comment 4: Add rlo and lro values to dir ishida@w3.org
• [HTML5] i18n comment 3: Add note about using bidi constructs in content ishida@w3.org
• [HTML5] i18n comment 2: bdo element doesn\'t leave rendering up to presentation layer ishida@w3.org
• [HTML5] i18n comment 1: Rendering bidi without a style sheet ishida@w3.org
• Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Geoffrey Sneddon
• i18n comments on dir Richard Ishida
• Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Mark Davis
• Re: several messages about handling encodings in HTML Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

• i18n Core telecon minutes 2008-02-27 Felix Sasaki
• RE: Bidi comments for html5 Richard Ishida
• FW: Bidi comments for html5 Richard Ishida

Wednesday, 20 February 2008

• Bidi comments for html5 Richard Ishida
• Comment about "Be flexible when referencing Unicode!" Richard Ishida

Monday, 18 February 2008

• Re: Suggestion for mail to HTML 5 WG about bidirectionality markup in HTML 5 Najib Tounsi
• i18n Core telecon minutes 20080-02-06 Richard Ishida
• i18n Core telecon minutes 2008-01-30 Richard Ishida
• RE: Suggestion for mail to HTML 5 WG about bidirectionality markup in HTML 5 Richard Ishida
• Re: [comments] Selectors-API Lachlan Hunt

Saturday, 16 February 2008

• Re: [comments] Selectors-API Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comments] Selectors-API Lachlan Hunt

Friday, 15 February 2008

• [comments] Selectors-API Addison Phillips
• RE: IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs Smith, Kevin, VF-Group
• Re: IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs David Clarke

Thursday, 14 February 2008

• Re:IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs Jeremy Carroll
• Suggestion for mail to HTML 5 WG about bidirectionality markup in HTML 5 Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

• Re: Re: §2.1.3 IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: §2.1.3 IRI/URI Canonicalization does not address IRIs with IDNs Felix Sasaki

Thursday, 7 February 2008

• Re: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 1: H34 example source direction Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: case in Selectors API Andrew Cunningham
• Changes to activity home and techniques index Richard Ishida
• Re: case in Selectors API Mark Davis
• case in Selectors API Addison Phillips

Thursday, 31 January 2008

• C14N 1.1 review concerns... Addison Phillips
• RE: dir attribute in HTML 5 Martin Duerst

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

• Re: dir attribute in HTML 5 Felix Sasaki
• RE: dir attribute in HTML 5 Richard Ishida
• Re: dir attribute in HTML 5 Najib Tounsi

Monday, 28 January 2008

• Re: Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of reference for "BCP 47" Felix Sasaki
• Re: Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of reference for "BCP 47" François Yergeau
• RE: Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of reference for "BCP 47" Grosso, Paul
• Unable to send comments on UAX29 Richard Ishida

Sunday, 27 January 2008

• Re: Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of reference for "BCP 47" John Cowan
• Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of reference for "BCP 47" Felix Sasaki

Thursday, 24 January 2008

• Re: UAX 29 review Addison Phillips
• UAX 29 review Richard Ishida
• Re: dir attribute in HTML 5 Addison Phillips
• dir attribute in HTML 5 Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

• UAX #29 comments Addison Phillips

Thursday, 17 January 2008

• ABNF guidance Addison Phillips
• [Fwd: Next JLTF f2f] Addison Phillips

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

• Re: comment on OWL1.1 Syntax: stale reference Ian Horrocks

Friday, 11 January 2008

• comment on OWL1.1 Syntax: stale reference Addison Phillips

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2008 07:12:55 UTC