Re: Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of reference for "BCP 47"

Grosso, Paul wrote:
> I think the XML Core WG is in agreement (I think this
> is just a "typo").  I'll ask the editor (Francois) to
> make this change before we send in the publication
> request for this PER (but I don't think we need to make
> the change before the PER transition telcon).
>   

I'm fine with that.

Thank you,

Felix

> paul
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
>> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
>> Sent: Sunday, 2008 January 27 1:57
>> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
>> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
>> Subject: Comment on XML 1.0 PER: Editorial update of 
>> reference for "BCP 47"
>>
>>
>> Hello XML Core Working Group,
>>
>> the I18N Core Working Group would like to make an editorial 
>> comment on the XML 1.0 PER draft at
>> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/01/PER-xml-20080205/
>>
>> in sec. 2.12
>> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/01/PER-xml-20080205/#sec-lang-tag
>> the document contains a reference to "BCP 47 or its 
>> successor". We would 
>> propose to change this to "BPC 47" (delete "or its successor"), since 
>> BCP 47 represents always the latest RFC used for language 
>> identification. See the same proposal we made as part of a comment on 
>> XML Schema 1.1. at
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4850#c2
>>
>> Please note that in case you just do not have time to do this 
>> edit, we 
>> do not regard this issue as critical and would be fine to 
>> deal with it after the PER transition.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   

Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 23:44:18 UTC