- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:35:49 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-12.html Comment 20 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0801-uax29/ Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI Location in reviewed document: 1.1 [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-12.html#Notation] Comment: "and not U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR)<]" We wonder if "<]" is a typo. If this is intended, shouldn't there be some explanation ?
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 11:32:29 UTC