- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:15:42 -0000
- To: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Fixed. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/blog/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org > Sent: 07 March 2008 11:33 > To: public-i18n-core@w3.org > Subject: [UAX29] i18n comment 5: Definition of EDGCs > > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-12.html > > Comment 5 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0801-uax29/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Tracked by: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 3.1 [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29- > 12.html#Default_Grapheme_Cluster_Table] > > Comment: > "Extended default grapheme clusters should be used in implementations in > preference to default grapheme clusters, because it provides better > results for Indic scripts such as Tamil." > > > This should come much earlier and be easier to find. We would suggest that > very near the beginning of section three the document states that it > defines two types of default grapheme cluster, and that the extended one > is the preferred. > > There also needs to be a separate section and heading for the definition > of XDGCs. The current definition is difficult to find because it is just a > small adjunct to the section about default grapheme clusters.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 14:12:24 UTC