- From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:10:42 -0800
- To: "Addison Phillips" <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
- Message-ID: <30b660a20802070910o684a3ef6t20b53f937375280d@mail.gmail.com>
I agree on both counts. On Feb 7, 2008 8:29 AM, Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > > All, > > I note that we have another example of case-mapping woes in the > Selectors API document. This case disturbs me and I think we should > submit a comment. The document is: http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/ > > The text in question is: > > -- > Note: The case sensitivity of namespace prefixes is effectively > determined by the implementation of the NSResolver object that is used > to resolve the namespaces. > > Note: In Unicode, caseless matching requires both strings that are being > compared, to be case folded prior to performing a binary comparison > [CaseMap]. However, since case folding is not the same as simply > uppercasing or lowercasing both strings and because the comparison is > being performed by the NSResolver object implemented by the author, this > specification cannot require case insensitive namespace prefixes. > -- > > My problems with this text are: > > 1. It seems to me that the WebAPI is doing implementers a disservice > here. If they would otherwise have required case-insensitivity except > for the requirement that implementers of NSResolver understand Unicode > case folding, then ignorance of Unicode case folding shouldn't be a > barrier to requiring case-insensitivity. I see no reason why a Spec > cannot require something if it is both well-documented and necessary, > which appears to be the case here. > > For that matter, it isn't strictly a "Unicode" problem (as implied by > the above): it is a general problem of case-normalizing text. Namespace > prefixes are not limited to ASCII, and implementations of Selectors API > need to deal with that fact. > > 2. Case-insensitive mapping is not completely sufficient anyway. No > mention is made of normalization. If there is something they are not > going to require but should mention, it would be Unicode normalization > (see CharMod-Norm). Binary comparison of Unicode strings for character > equivalence requires this normalization over-and-above case-folding. > > Regards, > > Addison > > -- > Addison Phillips > Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc. > Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG > > Internationalization is an architecture. > It is not a feature. > > -- Mark
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 17:11:01 UTC