Adam Argyle via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] scroll-start-target: auto doesn't match general meaning of auto (#11173) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-next] Adoption of the logo created by the CSS Next CG (#11193) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Disabled scroll-button state and styling (#11216) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] scroll-start-target: auto doesn't match general meaning of auto (#11173) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Can we relax size containment on ::scroll-marker-group? (#11166) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Can we relax size containment on ::scroll-marker-group? (#11166) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Can we relax size containment on ::scroll-marker-group? (#11166) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Specificity of Implicitly-Added `:scope` in Scoped Rules (#10196) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Motion Blur Effects (#11134) (Friday, 1 November)
Alan Stearns via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `both` value to scroll-state(snapped) feature. (#11181) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Combine all CSS3 specifications into a single HTML file (#11279) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Evaluate IACVT style queries to false (#11143) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-rhythm-1] block-step-size animations (#8459) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `both` value to scroll-state(snapped) feature. (#11181) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3][masonry] Masonry Syntax Debate (#11243) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3][masonry] Masonry Syntax Debate (#11243) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Evaluate IACVT style queries to false (#11143) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] column-rule-style: {none | hidden} forcing column-rule-width to 0 (#11090) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-rhythm-1] block-step-size animations (#8459) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] How are auto-generated `view-transition-name`s exposed in JS APIs (#10978) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Add Sebastian as CSS 2024 co-editor (#11157) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Add Sebastian as CSS 2024 co-editor (#11157) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3][masonry] variable track sizes + dense packing has poor performance (#9326) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Saturday, 2 November)
Alasdair McLeay via GitHub
Alex Rudenko via GitHub
Alexander Harding via GitHub
Alexis Menard via GitHub
Alison Maher via GitHub
Alvaro Montoro via GitHub
Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub
andruud via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping][selectors] `:root` should resolve to `:host` in shadow trees (#11000) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] :scope > * matches nothing in shadow trees (#11188) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] :scope > * matches nothing in shadow trees (#11188) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] :scope > * matches nothing in shadow trees (#11188) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-cascade-6] Support @import scope() syntax (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Support @import scope() syntax (#11237) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-cascade-6] Support @import scope() syntax (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-values] Total attr()-tainting for substitution values (Friday, 15 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-values] Total attr()-tainting for substitution values (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-1] Define before/after-change style in terms of base (#6688) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] :scope > * matches nothing in shadow trees (#11188) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Evaluate IACVT style queries to false (#11143) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Add a `media()` function for `@import` (#10972) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-cascade-6] Silence "multiple possible dfn" warnings (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [@scope] Allow declarations directly within @scope (Thursday, 7 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Should `@scope`'s `<scope-start>` & `<scope-end>` be unforgiving? (#10042) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Specificity of '&' is zero without a parent rule (#11135) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-1] Require a style flush at the end of commitStyles (#11085) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Monday, 4 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Evaluate IACVT style queries to false (#11143) (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-nesting-1] Specificity of '&' is zero without a parent rule (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-nesting-1] Specificity of '&' is zero without a parent rule (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-1] Define before/after-change style in terms of base (#6688) (Friday, 1 November)
Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
Antoine Quint via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] procedure to convert a time-based animation to a proportional animation might yield a division by 0 (#11276) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] procedure to convert a time-based animation to a proportional animation might yield a division by 0 (#11276) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] procedure to convert a time-based animation to a proportional animation might yield a division by 0 (#11276) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] procedure to convert a time-based animation to a proportional animation might yield a division by 0 (#11276) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] procedure to convert a time-based animation to a proportional animation might yield a division by 0 (#11276) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Progress APIs (#8799) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Friday, 15 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2][css-animations-2] Define order of transitioncancel and animationcancel events (#11176) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2][css-animations-2] Define order of transitioncancel and animationcancel events (#11176) (Monday, 11 November)
Antti Koivisto via GitHub
Ben via GitHub
Benoît Rouleau via GitHub
Bramus via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should @starting-style add a teensy bit of specifity? (#11263) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Headings case inconsistencies (#11201) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Friday, 29 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-page-3] Should `@page` declarations be hoisted? (#11272) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Behavior of calling `document.startViewTransition` synchronously more than once (#11292) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Behavior of calling `document.startViewTransition` synchronously more than once (#11292) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Custom effects (#6861) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions] undesired behaviour - transition of inherited value happening in sequence. (#5324) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle for ::before::marker or ::after::marker (#4456) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-5] Allow authors to explicitly place unlayered styles in the cascade layer order (#6323) (Friday, 15 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport] Add a meta viewport parameter to control ICB layout behavior for interactive overlays (#7767) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Access to custom properties from within the pseudos (#11153) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow targeting of the root having an active view-transition of any type (#11152) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow targeting of the root having an active view-transition of any type (#11152) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport-1] Add automation support for viewport segments (#11137) (Sunday, 3 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Allow Animation constructor to take an object of properties as second param (#11146) (Sunday, 3 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Nested at-rules within at-rule() (#11117) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Behavior of @supports(at-rule(@import)) (#11116) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Nested at-rules within at-rule() (#11117) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Unclear what is and isn't a descriptor for at-rule() (#11118) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Consider adding Element.scrollParent (#1522) (Friday, 1 November)
Brecht De Ruyte via GitHub
Brian Birtles via GitHub
Brian Kardell via GitHub
canalun via GitHub
Chase Knowlden via GitHub
Chris Bowes via GitHub
Chris Lilley via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Oklab captialization (#7880) (Saturday, 30 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] scroll-state(overflowing) is confusing because it ignores clipped overflowing content (#11182) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax] Give up on <urange> production? (#8835) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax] Give up on <urange> production? (#8835) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-color-hdr] No HDR color-difference (ΔE) metric specified (#11250) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] New Message/Action system colors (#11199) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [motion-1] Publish an updated WD or move to CR (#9165) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [motion-1] Publish an updated WD or move to CR (#9165) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4][Editorial] `<condition>` type that other specs reference (#10457) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] More precisely define the syntax of `scroll-state-feature` (#11127) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [meta] Rechartering 2025-2027 (#10671) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [meta] Rechartering 2025-2027 (#10671) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Add Sebastian as CSS 2024 co-editor (#11157) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add features to Safe to Release pre-CR Exceptions (#10687) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add features to Safe to Release pre-CR Exceptions (#10687) (Tuesday, 5 November)
Christoph Päper via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-break] Rename and/or reimagine `widows` and `orphans` (#11286) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Please split preferred content width from viewport/window/page width (#11255) (Saturday, 23 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-const] RFC: CSS constants (#11248) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting][selectors] Specificity of `& {}` (#11235) (Monday, 18 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting][selectors] Specificity of `& {}` (#11235) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting][selectors] Specificity of `& {}` (#11235) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds][css-text-decor] Keywords for predefined shadows (#11234) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Attribute match syntax extended to cover tag selectors (#6571) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional][featurequeries] Consider separate specification (#11231) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] New Message/Action system colors (#11199) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-color] New system colors: (#11199) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Make `accent-color`accept foreground and background value (#11180) (Tuesday, 12 November)
Connor Pearson via GitHub
CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarification font-variant-emoji should not affect characters `0-9#*` (#11014) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Preventing too-short final lines of blocks (Last Line Minimum Length) (#3473) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle for ::before::marker or ::after::marker (#4456) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Use the Unicode East Asian Auto Spacing for `text-autospace` (#11013) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport-1] Add automation support for viewport segments (#11137) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Should we have :open and :closed? (#11039) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] scroll-state(overflowing) is confusing because it ignores clipped overflowing content (#11182) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Pseudo-elements for checkmark and dropdown icon for appearance:base `<select>` (#10908) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Disabled scroll-button state and styling (#11216) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Bikeshed pseudoclasses for active scroll-marker (#10918) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Allowing markers to be active even when not scrollable to aligned position (#10738) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Focus order of generated controls (#10912) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] default background-origin for `border-area` in shorthand (#11167) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-2] `curve to` keyword `using` seems a bit off (#10649) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add specs to Official Definition (#9770) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Can you chain `border-area` and `text` in `background-clip`? (#10696) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] How are invalid types validated? (#10706) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Progress APIs (#8799) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4][Editorial] `<condition>` type that other specs reference (#10457) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables-1][css-values-5] Define "arbitrary substitution function" (#10679) (Thursday, 7 November)
Daniel Holbert via GitHub
Daniil Sakhapov via GitHub
Darin Adler via GitHub
David A via GitHub
David via GitHub
DavidMulder0 via GitHub
davidsgrogan via GitHub
Delan Azabani via GitHub
DJ-Miliciano via GitHub
Dmitry Makhnev via GitHub
Dmitry Statsenko via GitHub
dom1n1k via GitHub
Dominik Röttsches via GitHub
dshin-moz via GitHub
ebraminio via GitHub
EKotb456 via GitHub
Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub
- [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport-1] [all?] Figure out if / how we want to integrate with webdriver and other similar specs. (#11282) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document (#10773) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document (#10773) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] overlay property UA sheet is not enough. (#11194) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][css-view-transitions-2] Soft-freeze view-transitions L1 and merge into L2 (#11202) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Absolute positioning - Is the new inset & auto-size behaviour web-compatible? (#11195) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-position] overlay property UA sheet is not enough. (#11194) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Support setting offscreen content inert (#10711) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Scroll steps don't match implementations (#11164) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport-1] Add automation support for viewport segments (#11137) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] "Property registration cannot be scoped" differs from all implementations in a consistent way (#10541) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] "Property registration cannot be scoped" differs from all implementations in a consistent way (#10541) (Friday, 1 November)
Eric A. Meyer via GitHub
ExE Boss via GitHub
Fabio Spampinato via GitHub
fantasai via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Should block-ellipsis clip ::before/::after text? (#11253) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Bikeshed pseudoclasses for active scroll-marker (#10918) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] What is the active :checked marker when some markers point to elements within different scrolling containers? (#11098) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Creating scroll-marker groups within which to select an active marker (#10916) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3][masonry] Masonry Syntax Debate (#11243) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `scroll-state(scroll-to)` container feature queries (#11191) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] reading-flow following grid-auto-flow (#11209) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] reading-flow and mix of auto-flow and explicit items (#11208) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-rhythm-1] Define interaction of block-step-align and align-content (#11206) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-rhythm] [css-rhythm-1] summarize use-case(s) at start of Adjusting Block-level Box Heights (#1154) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-rhythm-1] block-step-size animations (#8459) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is meant by the distinction between "math function" vs. "function that evaluates to a <number>" (#11204) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-rythm-1] [editorial] remove redundant `px` dimension from `line-height-step` initial value (#11148) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-rhythm-1] interaction of block-step-size and aspect-ratio (#11205) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add specs to Official Definition (#9770) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add specs to Rough Interoperability (#9793) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add specs to Official Definition (#9770) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-2024] Add features to Safe to Release pre-CR Exceptions (#10687) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-next] Call for feedback: RFC open for CSS Levels categorization (#10281) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] column-rule-style: {none | hidden} forcing column-rule-width to 0 (#11090) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-tables] Does `overflow` apply to table-wrapper or table-grid? css-tables contradicts CSSWG resolution (#10881) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Names of <input type=range> / <input type=checkbox switch> pseudo-elements (#9830) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] Expand definition of `text-autospace: punctuation` (#11187) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Allow intervening space and no-break space in ::first-letter, preceding the letter (#9413) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-writing-modes-4] Allow sideways-x and vertical-x to share a block formatting context? (#10714) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Invisible line boxes and `line-clamp` (#11021) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] `<integer>` grammar terms and `<number>`-returning functions (#11040) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] `<integer>` grammar terms and `<number>`-returning functions (#11040) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] More precisely define the syntax of `scroll-state-feature` (#11127) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Pseudo-elements for checkmark and dropdown icon for appearance:base `<select>` (#10908) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-multicol-2] Add ::column pseudo, per WG resolution. #10715 (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] scroll-state(overflowing) is confusing because it ignores clipped overflowing content (#11182) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `both` value to scroll-state(snapped) feature. (#11181) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4][css-borders-4] Should initial value of border-color be sensitive to border-area? (#10907) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] default background-origin for `border-area` in shorthand (#11167) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] :local-link should have a more precise name (#10975) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3][masonry] variable track sizes + dense packing has poor performance (#9326) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Emulate conditionals with discontinuous function(s) in calc() (#6638) (Friday, 1 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Emulate conditionals with discontinuous function(s) in calc() (#6638) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Does `container-progress()` really want the entire `<size-feature>` production for its progress value? (#11120) (Friday, 1 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] `mix()` should take `<keyframes-name>` instead of `<'animation-name'>` (#11121) (Friday, 1 November)
Florian Rivoal via GitHub
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Preventing too-short final lines of blocks (Last Line Minimum Length) (#3473) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: Add move Event (Wednesday, 27 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: Add move Event (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] add ability to make the padding size include the border-width (#7770) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Add spec text for the continue variant of `line-clamp` (#10322) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] interaction between text-overflow:ellipsis and line-clamp (#10823) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Invisible line boxes and `line-clamp` (#11021) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Invisible line boxes and `line-clamp` (#11021) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] What counts as "immediately preceding" for `block-ellipsis`? (#10868) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] What counts as "immediately preceding" for `block-ellipsis`? (#10868) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] `block-ellipsis` interaction with height-based `line-clamp` (#10827) (Monday, 4 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-4][css-page-floats-3][editorial] Syntax simplification (Monday, 4 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-4][css-page-floats-3][editorial] Syntax simplification (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Draft spec for `continue: collapse` (#7708) (#10816) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] What counts as "immediately preceding" for `block-ellipsis`? (#10868) (Monday, 4 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-rythm-1] [editorial] remove redundant `px` dimension from `line-height-step` initial value (Monday, 4 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [CSS-UI-4] "Animmations" typo (#11132) (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-ui-4] Fix animmations -> animations typo (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-ui-4] Fix animmations -> animations typo (Friday, 1 November)
Fuqiao Xue via GitHub
Gavin Morrow via GitHub
Giannis Agogiatis via GitHub
gitspeaks via GitHub
- [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Disassociate sticky positioning from relative positioning (#11298) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Correct scrollbar space description (#11287) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2] link to absolutely-positioned definition + minor grammatical changes (#11251) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Clarify scrollar space description by simplifying edge terminology (#11287) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Clarify scrollar space description by simplifying edge terminology (#11287) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Clarify scrollar space description by simplifying edge terminology (#11287) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Clarify mandatory behavior for text-overflow with scrolling (#11291) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Clarify mandatory behavior for text-overflow with scrolling (#11291) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: Clarify scrolling space description by simplifying edge terminology (Wednesday, 27 November)
- [csswg-drafts] (css-overflow-3) Clarify how overflow values apply to the viewport (#11281) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Combine all CSS3 specifications into a single HTML file (#11279) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Combine all CSS3 specifications into a single HTML file (#11279) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS 2.2] discrepancy in handling auto values for properties in width equality constraint (#11267) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Clarify auto value computation for width and height of inline elements (#11268) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS 2.2] discrepancy in handling auto values for properties in width equality constraint (#11267) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Clarify auto value computation for width and height of inline elements (#11268) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS 2.2] discrepancy in handling auto values for properties in width equality constraint (#11267) (Sunday, 24 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS 2.2] discrepancy in handling auto values for properties in width equality constraint (#11267) (Sunday, 24 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Clarify auto value computation for width and height of inline elements (#11268) (Sunday, 24 November)
- [csswg-drafts] (CSS 2.2) discrepancy in handling auto values for properties in width equality constraint (#11267) (Sunday, 24 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css2] link to absolutely-positioned definition + minor grammatical changes (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: link to absolute-position containing block (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Suggestion: Rename 'Block container' to 'Flow container' (#11219) (Sunday, 17 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarify float positioning with anonymous block-level boxes (#11226) (Sunday, 17 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Clarify float positioning with anonymous block-level boxes (#11226) (Sunday, 17 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Suggestion: Rename 'Block container' to 'Flow container' (#11219) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display] Notation proposal: 'flow container' (#1265) (Friday, 15 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Suggestion: Rename 'Block container' to 'Flow container' (#11219) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "block container" is incomplete (#11214) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Definition of "block container" is incomplete (#11214) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Clarification needed on simultaneous block and inline formatting contexts for block container boxes (#11177) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification needed on simultaneous block and inline formatting contexts for block container boxes (#11177) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification needed on simultaneous block and inline formatting contexts for block container boxes (#11177) (Monday, 11 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Clarification needed on simultaneous block and inline formatting contexts for block container boxes (#11177) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Sunday, 10 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Clarification on BFC established by non-block containers (#11175) (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Thursday, 7 November)
Guillaume via GitHub
- [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Clarify the value range of pseudo selectors (#11299) (Saturday, 30 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] "Consume a block's contents" leaves `decls` list with (#11017) (Saturday, 30 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] Should `<declaration-value>` embed semantics? (#11296) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-3] Define `<declaration>` (#8795) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Turn `<media-query>` to `not all` only when produced by `<media-query-list>` (#11289) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Add a `media()` function for `@import` (#10972) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Support @import scope() syntax (#11237) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] "Consume a block's contents" leaves `decls` list with (#11017) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] "Consume a block's contents" leaves `decls` list with (#11017) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] "Consume a block's contents" leaves `decls` list with (#11017) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-page-3] Should `@page` declarations be hoisted? (#11272) (Monday, 25 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] Clarify why declarations after/before invalid rule error should be separated (#11271) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] Potentially missing a "parse error" specifier in "consume a URL token"? (#7987) (Monday, 25 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-env-1] How to handle `env()` in descriptors not exposed as `CSSOMString`? (#11264) (Saturday, 23 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Specs that use CSS values outside of normal style rules should provide information on calc()/non-absolute length resolution in a uniform way (#10853) (Friday, 22 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] How to handle math functions in font feature value declarations? (#11261) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is meant by the distinction between "math function" vs. "function that evaluates to a <number>" (#11204) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] Tokenize comments into whitespaces (#11252) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax] Give up on <urange> production? (#8835) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] How to specify grammar for rules? (#11241) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] New parsing algorithms do not handle `}` tokens correctly in style attributes (#11113) (Saturday, 16 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-color-5] Validate color profile components case-insensitively (Friday, 15 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-color-5] Validate color profile components case-insensitively (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api-1] Use custom-ident instead of custom-highlight-name (#9483) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api-1] Use custom-ident instead of custom-highlight-name (#9483) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1][css-cascade-6] Clarify absolutization of the selectors of `@scope` and nested style rules (#11212) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] `<integer>` grammar terms and `<number>`-returning functions (#11040) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Saturday, 9 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is the purpose of `<ident> : <declaration-value>` in `supports()`? (#11155) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is the purpose of `<ident> : <declaration-value>` in `supports()`? (#11155) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Friday, 8 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Friday, 8 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Should `CSSFontFeatureValuesMap.set()` take signed values? (#11158) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is the purpose of `<ident> : <declaration-value>` in `supports()`? (#11155) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-rythm-1] [editorial] remove redundant `px` dimension from `line-height-step` initial value (#11148) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Does `container-progress()` really want the entire `<size-feature>` production for its progress value? (#11120) (Sunday, 3 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Nested at-rules within at-rule() (#11117) (Sunday, 3 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Nested at-rules within at-rule() (#11117) (Saturday, 2 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-backgrounds-4] Define background-repeat|position longhands with a logical property group (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-backgrounds-4] Define background-repeat|position longhands with a logical property group (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Using `first-valid()` and `mix()` in shorthands (#11136) (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-4][css-page-floats-3][editorial] Syntax simplification (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-4][css-page-floats-3][editorial] Syntax simplification (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-syntax-3] Remove duplicate token stream creations (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-syntax-3] Remove duplicate token stream creations (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr()'s "px"/etc keywords (#11034) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-all] expand all property sintax for non-inherited props (#11123) (Friday, 1 November)
hanfengv via GitHub
Ian Bellomy via GitHub
Isaac Muse via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
Jake Archibald via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Cursor and hover effect behaviour (#11274) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Access to custom properties from within the pseudos (#11153) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Cursor and hover effect behaviour (#11274) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
James Addison via GitHub
Jan Bösenberg via GitHub
Jan via GitHub
Jane Ori via GitHub
Jedidiah Amaraegbu via GitHub
Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
Jen Simmons via GitHub
Jens Oliver Meiert via GitHub
Jeroen Zwartepoorte via GitHub
jfkthame via GitHub
Jo Liss via GitHub
Jochen Kühner via GitHub
Joey Arhar via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-forms-1] Add new pseudo-elements for customizable select (#10986) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Should we have :open and :closed? (#11039) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] select:hover and select:active styles (#11185) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] select:hover and select:active styles (#11185) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Pseudo-elements for checkmark and dropdown icon for appearance:base `<select>` (#10908) (Monday, 4 November)
Johannes Odland via GitHub
John Munson via GitHub
Josh Tumath via GitHub
jsnkuhn via GitHub
Keith Cirkel via GitHub
Kent C. Dodds via GitHub
kevers-google via GitHub
Kevin Babbitt via GitHub
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-color-adjust-1] Add example for `color-mix()` in Forced Colors Mode. #11097 (Wednesday, 27 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-color-adjust-1] Add example for `color-mix()` in Forced Colors Mode. #11097 (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] column-rule-style: {none | hidden} forcing column-rule-width to 0 (#11090) (Friday, 22 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] column-rule-style: {none | hidden} forcing column-rule-width to 0 (#11090) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] column-rule-style: {none | hidden} forcing column-rule-width to 0 (#11090) (Friday, 22 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-multicol-1] Clarify effect of `hidden` on `column-rule-width`. #11090 (Friday, 22 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-multicol-1] Clarify effect of `hidden` on `column-rule-width`. #11090 (Friday, 22 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-multicol-1] Clarify effect of `hidden` on `column-rule-width`. #11090 (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-gaps-1] Initial editor's draft. #10393 (#11115) (Saturday, 9 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables-1][css-values-5] Define "arbitrary substitution function" (#10679) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-gaps-1] Initial editor's draft. #10393 (#11115) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] column-rule-style: {none | hidden} forcing column-rule-width to 0 (#11090) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-gaps-1] Initial editor's draft. #10393 (#11115) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-gaps-1] Initial editor's draft. #10393 (#11115) (Monday, 4 November)
Khushal Sagar via GitHub
Konnor Rogers via GitHub
Kyra Seevers via GitHub
L. David Baron via GitHub
Lance J. via GitHub
Lea Verou via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Oklab captialization (#7880) (Saturday, 30 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] `:has-shadow` pseudo-class (#11007) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Feature for making text always fit the width of its parent (#2528) (Saturday, 16 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Oklab captialization (#7880) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] enable the use of counter() inside calc() (#1026) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors] Standardize `:(‑moz‑)first‑node` and `:(‑moz‑)last‑node` (#3216) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] `:first-node`/`:last-node`/`:only-node` pseudo-classes (#11154) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] `:first-node`/`:last-node`/`:only-node` pseudo-classes (#11154) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Attribute match syntax extended to cover tag selectors (#6571) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [selectors] `:first-node`/`:last-node`/`:only-node` pseudo-classes (#11154) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Monday, 4 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Friday, 1 November)
Lorin Halpert via GitHub
Marina21416 via GitHub
Matthew Dean via GitHub
Michael Davey via GitHub
Michaël Vanderheyden via GitHub
Miriam Suzanne via GitHub
Monknow via GitHub
Morten Stenshorne via GitHub
Nasonov V via GitHub
Nathan Chase via GitHub
Nehuen Prados via GitHub
Nico Burns via GitHub
NicTanghe via GitHub
Nilesh Prajapati via GitHub
Noam Rosenthal via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Behavior of calling `document.startViewTransition` synchronously more than once (#11292) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Behavior of calling `document.startViewTransition` synchronously more than once (#11292) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Behavior of calling `document.startViewTransition` synchronously more than once (#11292) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document (#10773) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document (#10773) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document (#10773) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document (#10773) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Revert "First pass at layered capture (#11045)" (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][css-view-transitions-2] Soft-freeze view-transitions L1 and merge into L2 (#11202) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-shapes-2] Specify the grammar for `shape()` (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-2] Order of points and control points in `shape()` (#10666) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][css-view-transitions-2] Soft-freeze view-transitions L1 and merge into L2 (#11202) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Editorial: fix a few nits for WD publishing (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Define behavior of scrollbars and overflow with layered capture (#11079) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Add changelog for new ED (Thursday, 7 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] How are invalid types validated? (#10706) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] How are invalid types validated? (#10706) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Optionally capture some properties (e.g. opacity/border) as style instead of snapshot (#10585) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Define behavior of root element in layered capture (#11150) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Monday, 4 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Define behavior of root element in layered capture (#11150) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] "Property registration cannot be scoped" differs from all implementations in a consistent way (#10541) (Friday, 1 November)
Oriol Brufau via GitHub
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-sizing-3] Supplement the 'Applies to' field for width and heigh (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Clarify scrollar space description by simplifying edge terminology (#11287) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align][css-sizing] Should `place-self: stretch` and `width: stretch` result in different size for abspos? (#11293) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] Reserved scroller space between content edge and padding edge (#11288) (Friday, 29 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-3] Clarify scrollar space description by simplifying edge terminology (Friday, 29 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align][css-sizing] Should `place-self: stretch` and `width: stretch` result in different size for abspos? (#11293) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align] `normal` self-alignment for abspos tables should behave as `start` (#11285) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Allow authors to choose a fallback alignment for distributed alignments (#11259) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Clarify auto value computation for width and height of inline elements (#11268) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Clarify auto value computation for width and height of inline elements (#11268) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS 2.2] discrepancy in handling auto values for properties in width equality constraint (#11267) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-align] Proposal: `justify-items` and `justify-self` to align flex items that are alone on their line (#11244) (Saturday, 23 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] overflow: overlay; not work (#11260) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] overflow: overlay; not work (#11260) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Allow authors to choose a fallback alignment for distributed alignments (#11259) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Section 3.5.1 Conflicts with CSS2 Positioning Behavior (#11258) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Should block-ellipsis clip ::before/::after text? (#11253) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle for ::before::marker or ::after::marker (#4456) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] How does height: stretch interact with margin collapsing with parent (#11044) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-align] Proposal: `justify-items` and `justify-self` to align flex items that are alone on their line (#11244) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] How does height: stretch interact with margin collapsing with parent (#11044) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-align] Proposal: `justify-items` and `justify-self` to align flex items that are alone on their line (#11244) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-align] Support `justify-items` for flexbox containers (and `justify-self` for items) (#9495) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle for ::before::marker or ::after::marker (#4456) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Incorrect handling of auto inset properties in absolute positioning (#11242) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Number-of-siblings pseudoclass proposal (#1176) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Can't generate html file for bikeshed file (#11233) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing] How to transfer intrinsic keywords via aspect ratio? (#11236) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What does sibling-index()/sibling-count() return if there's no originating element? (#11232) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Auto margins aren't just treated as zero (#11230) (Monday, 18 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Browser don't prioritize auto margins over stretch self-alignment for abspos (#11229) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] `normal` alignment doesn't really behave as `stretch` for non-replaced abspos with auto insets (#11215) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarify float positioning with anonymous block-level boxes (#11226) (Sunday, 17 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarify float positioning with anonymous block-level boxes (#11226) (Sunday, 17 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-grid] Automatic minimum size on replaced element with `overflow` different than visible/clip (#8502) (Saturday, 16 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-grid] Automatic minimum size on replaced element with `overflow` different than visible/clip (#8502) (Saturday, 16 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] overlay property UA sheet is not enough. (#11194) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Suggestion: Rename 'Block container' to 'Flow container' (#11219) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Friday, 15 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Is a box that establishes a BFC considered a Block Container? (#11217) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align] `normal` alignment doesn't really behave as `stretch` for abspos with auto insets (#11215) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "block container" is incomplete (#11214) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "block container" is incomplete (#11214) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Absolute positioning - Is the new inset & auto-size behaviour web-compatible? (#11195) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on "value propagation to the viewport" in BFC conditions (#11210) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr()'s "px"/etc keywords (#11034) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative, static and sticky positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Absolute positioning - Is the new inset & auto-size behaviour web-compatible? (#11195) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Specify what edge forms the containing block for relative and static positioned boxes (#11196) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Should abspos really use the `place-items` of the parent instead of the containing block? (#11197) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Should abspos really use the `place-items` of the parent instead of the containing block? (#11197) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-align] Should abspos really use the `place-items` of the parent instead of the containing block? (#11197) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] enable the use of counter() inside calc() (#1026) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing] Intrinsic size of <img> / <video> with aspect ratio but no definite size (#10605) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] if using `display` we should provide examples for `inline masonry`, and include the `inline-masonry` legacy fallback (#10961) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification needed on simultaneous block and inline formatting contexts for block container boxes (#11177) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] `background-clip` with scrollbar (#11169) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification needed on simultaneous block and inline formatting contexts for block container boxes (#11177) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-flow] Define the intrinsic sizing algorithm for block containers (#9120) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Clarification on BFC established by non-block containers (#11175) (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Sunday, 10 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-tables][css-position] Disagreeement about percentage resolution in insets of relpos caption (#11171) (Friday, 8 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] `background-clip` with scrollbar (#11169) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-2] A mention of "auto" is linkified to the wrong definition (#11168) (Friday, 8 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Possible `background-clip` value to punch holes in the background layer in the shape of font charatcters (#11160) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Possible `background-clip` value to punch holes in the background layer in the shape of font charatcters (#11160) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Definition of "Block-level box" in CSS2 Specification (#11126) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-1] Distribution of intrinsic sizes according to flex factors doesn't handle sum < 1 (#6078) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] `:first-node`/`:last-node`/`:only-node` pseudo-classes (#11154) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] How does height: stretch interact with margin collapsing with parent (#11044) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Atomic CSS (#11142) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Using `first-valid()` and `mix()` in shorthands (#11136) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] expand all property syntax for non-inherited props (#11123) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Using `first-valid()` and `mix()` in shorthands (#11136) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Add a CSS selector to only target built in elements (#11140) (Friday, 1 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Add a CSS selector to only target built in elements (#11140) (Friday, 1 November)
Owen Nicol via GitHub
Philipp Rudloff via GitHub
Philipp Wrann via GitHub
PrudveeT via GitHub
Psychpsyo via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-2] What does it actually mean for an element to be selected? (#11297) (Friday, 29 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-2] What does it actually mean for an element to be selected? (#11297) (Friday, 29 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-2] What does it actually mean for an element to be selected? (#11297) (Friday, 29 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-contain] Add missing punctuation. (Tuesday, 26 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] CSSContainerRule.containerQuery does not define how to handle omitted `<container-query>` (#11269) (Sunday, 24 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-conditional] Fix link to CSS-CONTAIN-3 (Saturday, 23 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Spec has conflicting info on whether or not `<media-query-list>` allows trailing commas (#11254) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Make it clear that `allow-keywords` can't just interpolate with intrinsic sizes. (#11179) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-values-5] Make it clear that `allow-keywords` can't just interpolate with intrinsic sizes. (Monday, 11 November)
pumpkinsandpies via GitHub
Quentin Albert via GitHub
Rachel Andrew via GitHub
Raph Levien via GitHub
Raura via GitHub
Robert Flack via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] procedure to convert a time-based animation to a proportional animation might yield a division by 0 (#11276) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] Should scrollsnapchanging target the currently visible element during flings (#10838) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Bikeshed pseudoclasses for active scroll-marker (#10918) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Remove `prev` and `next` scroll-button-direction (#11249) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations][web-animations-2] rewinding a finished scroll-driven animation and playing it again (#11270) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Editoral - move scroll buttons under scroll navigation controls (#11222) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Remove `prev` and `next` scroll-button-direction (#11249) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] scroll-start-target: auto doesn't match general meaning of auto (#11173) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Allowing markers to be active even when not scrollable to aligned position (#10738) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Creating scroll-marker groups within which to select an active marker (#10916) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Relevance of scroll-driven animations (#11223) (Friday, 15 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-5] Remove normative active marker algorithm. (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Editoral - move scroll buttons under scroll navigation controls (#11222) (Friday, 15 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-overflow-5] Editoral - move scroll buttons under scroll navigation controls (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view-1] Apply scroll snap to scroll-into-view-position (#11073) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Disabled scroll-button state and styling (#11216) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Disabled scroll-button state and styling (#11216) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Active marker in 2d scroller? (#11198) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Active marker in 2d scroller? (#11198) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] scroll-start-target: auto doesn't match general meaning of auto (#11173) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Support Cross-Origin iframe use case (#4344) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] consider [css-scoping] / `@scope` + `select()` for referencing scroller (#8028) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Allow named ranges to be used with math functions (#8852) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Range for entire scroll range (#9367) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Synchronizing scroll position in scroll driven animation (#10545) (Friday, 8 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Synchronizing scroll position in scroll driven animation (#10545) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1][css-animations-1] A non-animated "Is in viewport" (#10582) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Consider adding a timeline range that takes ink overflow into account (#10581) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Can we relax size containment on ::scroll-marker-group? (#11166) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Meta-issue: Unresolved `sticky` positioning use cases (#11145) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-1] commitStyles followed by cancel should not trigger a transition (#11084) (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Limit scrolling to the associated scroll container when activating a marker (#11138) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view-1] Option for scrollIntoView that doesn't propagate to root (#9452) (Friday, 1 November)
Romain Menke via GitHub
Roman Komarov via GitHub
Rune Lillesveen via GitHub
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Friday, 29 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `both` value to scroll-state(snapped) feature. (#11181) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `both` value to scroll-state(snapped) feature. (#11181) (Friday, 29 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to 'overflowing' scroll-state query #11183 (Friday, 29 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-conditional-5] Add 'both' value to scroll-state(snapped) feature #11181 (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `scroll-state(scroll-to)` container feature queries (#11191) (Monday, 25 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-conditional-5] Rename overflowing to scrollable #11182 (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `both` value to scroll-state(snapped) feature. (#11181) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] allow specifying flat vs light tree in `sibling-index()` and `sibling-count()` (#9562) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Tree structure of scroll container controls (#11125) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] overlay property UA sheet is not enough. (#11194) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Valid size query containers and box tree re-ordering (#11213) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] scroll-state(overflowing) is confusing because it ignores clipped overflowing content (#11182) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Make `<container-query>` optional in `@container` (#9192) (Monday, 11 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Make `<container-query>` optional in `@container` (#9192) (Monday, 11 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-conditional-5] Make <container-query> optional #9192 (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Evaluate IACVT style queries to false (#11143) (Friday, 1 November)
Sam Atkins via GitHub
Sam Weinig via GitHub
Scott Kellum via GitHub
Sebastian Zartner via GitHub
SelfMadeSystem via GitHub
shane kunz via GitHub
Shaw Jia via GitHub
ShobujDash via GitHub
Simon Fraser via GitHub
Simon Pieters via GitHub
Soni L. via GitHub
Steffen via GitHub
Steinar H. Gunderson via GitHub
Stephen Chenney via GitHub
Stephen Haney via GitHub
Steve Orvell via GitHub
Stoyan via GitHub
Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Pseudo-elements for checkmark and dropdown icon for appearance:base `<select>` (#10908) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-forms-1] Add new pseudo-elements for customizable select (#10986) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should @starting-style add a teensy bit of specifity? (#11263) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Please split preferred content width from viewport/window/page width (#11255) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] pointer-events should have a filtering capability (#6280) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `scroll-state(scroll-to)` container feature queries (#11191) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-const] RFC: CSS constants (#11248) (Friday, 22 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-const] RFC: CSS constants (#11248) (Friday, 22 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] Please split preferred content width from viewport/window/page width (#11255) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Please split preferred content width from viewport/window/page width (#11255) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Editoral - move scroll buttons under scroll navigation controls (#11222) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] What is the active :checked marker when some markers point to elements within different scrolling containers? (#11098) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-forms-1] Add new pseudo-elements for customizable select (#10986) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Remove `prev` and `next` scroll-button-direction (#11249) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is meant by the distinction between "math function" vs. "function that evaluates to a <number>" (#11204) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Limit scrolling to the associated scroll container when activating a marker (#11138) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view-1] Option for scrollIntoView that doesn't propagate to root (#9452) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Focus order of generated controls (#10912) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Creating scroll-marker groups within which to select an active marker (#10916) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Bikeshed pseudoclasses for active scroll-marker (#10918) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] How does height: stretch interact with margin collapsing with parent (#11044) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] How does height: stretch interact with margin collapsing with parent (#11044) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] How does height: stretch interact with margin collapsing with parent (#11044) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Premultiplication in cylindrical spaces and mixing (#11238) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Missing link in a single paragraph (#11227) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-rythm-1] [editorial] remove redundant `px` dimension from `line-height-step` initial value (#11148) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is meant by the distinction between "math function" vs. "function that evaluates to a <number>" (#11204) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr()'s "px"/etc keywords (#11034) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr()'s "px"/etc keywords (#11034) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] `<integer>` grammar terms and `<number>`-returning functions (#11040) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] :scope > * matches nothing in shadow trees (#11188) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-2] `curve to` keyword `using` seems a bit off (#10649) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scroll button pseudo-elements (#10722) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-2] Add ::column pseudo, per WG resolution. #10715 (#11186) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-multicol-2] Add ::column pseudo, per WG resolution. #10715 (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Support setting offscreen content inert (#10711) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Support setting offscreen content inert (#10711) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Interpolate values between breakpoints (#6245) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] Add 'interactivity' property, per #10711 (#11178) (Monday, 11 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-ui-4] Add 'interactivity' property, per #10711 (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Sunday, 10 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Saturday, 9 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditionals-5] Test for the support of a property name (#11159) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders] Standardize groove/ridge/inset/outset border-color computations (#9393) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor] Detecting active @position-fallback (#8171) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders] Standardize groove/ridge/inset/outset border-color computations (#9393) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is the purpose of `<ident> : <declaration-value>` in `supports()`? (#11155) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] What is the purpose of `<ident> : <declaration-value>` in `supports()`? (#11155) (Friday, 8 November)
- Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] Allow declarations directly in @scope? (#10389) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Add a `media()` function for `@import` (#10972) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] New property to control the direction of slider controls (#9832) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Form control pseudo-element audit (#9825) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] default background-origin for `border-area` in shorthand (#11167) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-5] Scrolling to unreachable scroll aligned marker positions (#11165) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4][css-borders-4] Should initial value of border-color be sensitive to border-area? (#10907) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] Names of <input type=range> / <input type=checkbox switch> pseudo-elements (#9830) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables-1][css-values-5] Define "arbitrary substitution function" (#10679) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Proposal: Update :visited language to state UAs must preserve user privacy (#11151) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr() and forwards compatible parsing (#11035) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3][masonry] variable track sizes + dense packing has poor performance (#9326) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] we should ensure an if with no fallback can be reasoned about later (#10956) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Evaluate IACVT style queries to false (#11143) (Saturday, 2 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] we should ensure an if with no fallback can be reasoned about later (#10956) (Friday, 1 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-variables] Should `var(var(--x))` work? (#11144) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] A way to dynamically construct custom-ident and dashed-ident values (#9141) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Using `first-valid()` and `mix()` in shorthands (#11136) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] attr()'s "px"/etc keywords (#11034) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] if() conditions with calc() comparisons (#11104) (Friday, 1 November)
Tatsunori Uchino via GitHub
Tim Nguyen via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4][css-scoping] Can `::slotted()` be followed with element-backed pseudo-elements? (#11284) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4][css-scoping] Can `::slotted()` be followed with element-backed pseudo-elements? (#11284) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudos-4][css-scoping] Can `::slotted()` be followed with element-backed pseudo-elements? (#11284) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 25 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-position] Fix obsolete references to `inset-area` (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] UA stylesheet for appearance:base `<select>` (#10857) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Colors to use for appearance:base `<select>` (#10909) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][css-view-transitions-2] Soft-freeze view-transitions L1 and merge into L2 (#11202) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors support `color-mix()`? (#11097) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] Mesh gradient / Freeform gradient / 2D gradient (#7648) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders] Standardize groove/ridge/inset/outset border-color computations (#9393) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995) (Saturday, 2 November)
Tito via GitHub
tleydxdy via GitHub
vmpstr via GitHub
W3C Bot via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Supplement the 'Applies to' field for width and heigh (#11290) (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] Add missing punctuation. (#11275) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Fix link to CSS-CONTAIN-3 (#11266) (Saturday, 23 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Fix typo (#11246) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] link to absolute-position containing block (#11239) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Missing link in a single paragraph (#11227) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] Missing link in a single paragraph (#11227) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-4] small wording update (#11225) (Saturday, 16 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] Make it clear that `allow-keywords` can't just interpolate with intrinsic sizes. (#11179) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] Fix animmations -> animations typo (#11133) (Friday, 1 November)
Wes Bos via GitHub
Westbrook Johnson via GitHub
Wick via GitHub
woody-li via GitHub
Yash Raj Bharti via GitHub
Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub
محمد بوصالح via GitHub
一丝 via GitHub
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarification font-variant-emoji should not affect characters `0-9#*` (#11014) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarification font-variant-emoji should not affect characters `0-9#*` (#11014) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarification font-variant-emoji should not affect characters `0-9#*` (#11014) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `scroll-state(scroll-to)` container feature queries (#11191) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-align] Proposal: `justify-items` and `justify-self` to align flex items that are alone on their line (#11244) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Should block-ellipsis clip ::before/::after text? (#11253) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Number-of-siblings pseudoclass proposal (#1176) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Number-of-siblings pseudoclass proposal (#1176) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overscroll] Whether to move position:fixed elements during overscrolling (#6299) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] `position-fallback-bounds` vs `position-container` (#9868) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add `scroll-state(scroll-to)` container feature queries (#11191) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] scroll-state(overflowing) is confusing because it ignores clipped overflowing content (#11182) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5]Add `scroll-state(scroll-to)` container feature queries (#11191) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists] The `cursor` property should apply to `::marker`s (#6203) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Progress APIs (#8799) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add inline/block/x/y values to `overflowing` scroll-state query? (#11183) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Control whether an element is findable/searchable (Ctrl+F) (#3460) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarification font-variant-emoji should not affect characters `0-9#*` (#11014) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3][css-sizing-4] Move `fit-content` keyword to Level 3 and `fit-content()` function to Level 4 (#10601) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-4] Feature detection for descriptors (#2463) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-5] Add ability to test for at-rule preludes (#6966) (Tuesday, 5 November)
張俊芝 via GitHub
Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2024 23:17:52 UTC