- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:23:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Going back further into the discussion, I’d like to bring back the idea of using attr() fallback for the proposed `auto` behavior. If it turns out this is useful and prevalent, we can then talk later about giving it a name for ease of use. > > Perhaps we have just these three options? > > 1. Spec/implement `auto` and `match-element` > 2. Spec/implement `match-element` only for now, and use `attr(id, match-element)` for the proposed auto functionality > 3. Do not spec/implement either `auto` OR `match-element` yet (was @jakearchibald suggesting this?) Note with (2), that `match-element` as a fallback in `attr` doesn't work out of the box, unless we say that `match-element` generates a string or `ident` that's observable in means other than view transition. I'm personally in favor of (3), OK with (2), and opposing 1 (in its current form). -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10995#issuecomment-2489476334 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2024 20:23:27 UTC