- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 22:21:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Right, we *very intentionally* didn't allow just a property name, because properties gain behavior regularly, and we wanted to make sure people were actually testing the behavior they were depending on, rather than just assuming that everyone who supported a given property supported all the possible values of that property. You can still make that assumption, as @Loirooriol points out, but you have to be more explicit about testing a global value, which definitely *looks* odd and suggests that you're doing the wrong thing. For at-rules, we originally planned to try and do a similar thing, but decided it was just too weird to put an entire at-rule into a query like that. So, we fell back to the trivial "do you at least understand this at-rule name" behavior. At least it's less common for at-rules to change behavior, so it's a bit safer to do this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11159#issuecomment-2465840817 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 8 November 2024 22:21:05 UTC