- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 04:11:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Exact, I had `CSS.supports(<declaration>)` in mind whereas it takes `<supports-condition>`. I already read your article before and forget about `selector()` and `font-tech()`, so now `at-rule()` makes sense. Single argument blocks/functions is probably easier for authors, even if it means feeding a whole rule to define a nesting context. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11117#issuecomment-2453287718 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2024 04:11:20 UTC