Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Allow an auto-generated `view-transition-name` that doesn't default to ID (#10995)

100%. Although, even in that case, I don't think we should be introducing arbitrary differences.

What's making me sad in this thread, is I'm pointing out the footguns of this feature in actual real-world use-cases, and also pointing out how it's harder to teach a feature that has arbitrary branching behaviours, and the counterargument seems to be the assertion that "`auto` is useful and expected" without any reason or evidence.

My points are being dismissed as being related to frameworks, when they're not, and the counter evidence is a bunch of codepen demos that actually want scoped view transitions.

Can we get this on the agenda? I don't think this is being handled well.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10995#issuecomment-2459416026 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2024 10:47:30 UTC