- From: Bramus via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:58:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> To be clear, I'm happy with spec'ing and shipping `match-element`, but I'm not sure about supporting `attr(id, match-element)` because it would mean `match-element` generates an actual observable name, or alternatively that `attr` would have a special behavior as a `view-transition-name` value. +1 on making `match-element` not observable. > I wonder though if in the future we'd want something like the `match-element` behavior outside of view transitions, in which case just having this as a CSS primitive that produces idents would not be that bad. The solution here would be the proposed `ident()` function (See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9141) which could take an argument that auto-generates an observable ident. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10995#issuecomment-2489702607 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2024 22:58:19 UTC