- From: Wick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:19:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Ok, I see. But this can be misleading on first reading. What if we split this sentence into two sentences, so that we can reference it correctly Tab Atkins Jr. ***@***.***> 于 2024年11月20日周三 01:35写道： > Rejecting this PR; turning off that option would generally add more links > in several places. > > It's unfortunate that the W3C has previously rejected our attempt to make > repeated links in a paragraph lower-contrast, forcing us to instead just > remove the extra links *entirely* if we don't want to overwhelm a > paragraph that references the same concepts multiple times. Alas. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11227#issuecomment-2486343372>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMX4BJOQYCOLUIB62G32MJD2BNZHNAVCNFSM6AAAAABR62RALGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOBWGM2DGMZXGI> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > -- GitHub Notification of comment by OnlyWick Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11227#issuecomment-2486432722 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2024 18:19:19 UTC