Friday, 31 October 2008
- Site name misspelled
- Re: Additional resource for consideration
- Re: inconsitency with G122
- Re: WCAG 2: Request for Response
- Re: Image use cases that WCAG doesn't address
- Re: WCAG 2: Request for Response
Thursday, 30 October 2008
- RE: Image use cases that WCAG doesn't address
- RE: WCAG 2: Request for Response
- Re: WCAG 2: Request for Response
- Re: WCAG 2: Request for Response
Wednesday, 29 October 2008
- WCAG 2: Request for Response
- WCAG 2: Request for Response
- WCAG 2: Request for Response
- WCAG 2: Request for Response
- WCAG 2: Request for Response
- Praise for How to Meet WCAG 2.0
Monday, 27 October 2008
Friday, 24 October 2008
- Re: 18 point or 14 point bold
- Re: 18 point or 14 point bold
- Re: 18 point or 14 point bold
- Re: 18 point or 14 point bold
- Re: WCAG 2.0 automated verification and intended reporting layout
- RE: WCAG 2.0 automated verification and intended reporting layout
- RE: WCAG 2.0 automated verification and intended reporting layout
- Re: "URI" or "URL"
- Re: WCAG 2.0 automated verification and intended reporting layout
- Re: Example shows questionable implementation
- Re: Is the resource "Pick a heading" sending out the right message
- Re: Failure for 2.4.6
- Re: large scale text for CJK
- Re: 18 point or 14 point bold
- Re: 18 point or 14 point bold
- Re: Image use cases that WCAG doesn't address
- Re: SC 3.2.5 vs. SC 2.2.4 and G75 and G76
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
Wednesday, 8 October 2008
- Is the resource "Pick a heading" sending out the right message
- Example shows questionable implementation
Monday, 6 October 2008
- Re: Editorial problems - German translation
- Re: H44 : sufficient technique for 3.2.4?
- Re: G65 - editorial correction
- Re: glyph for English
- Re: definition of "process"
- Re: on a full-screen window
- Re: "must be presented in non-text format"
Friday, 3 October 2008
- Re: "virtual magnifying glasses" in Note 1 for "viewport"
- Re: Note 5 in "conforming alternate version"
- Re: wording of "dialog"
- Re: "minimum" or "enhanced"?
- Re: Large Print
- Re: providing a multipage view rather than a single file version
- Re: Geospatial mapping applications
- Re: HTML techniques - WCAG 2: technique is duplicated