- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:50:33 -0700
- To: "Makoto Ueki" <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote: > > > Name: Makoto Ueki > Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com > Affiliation: JIS Working Group > Document: W2 > Item Number: Success Criterion 1.1.1 > Part of Item: > Comment Type: editorial > Summary of Issue: "must be presented in non-text format" > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > "must be presented in non-text format" which is defined in Glossary can be changed to "would be invalid if presented in text" as defined in Grossary. The phrase is used just one time. > > Proposed Change: > Just replace "must be presented in non-text format" with "would be invalid if presented in text" and remove "must be presented in non-text format" from Glossary. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ We are updating the definition as proposed. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Monday, 6 October 2008 04:51:15 UTC