- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:47:40 -0700
- To: "Makoto Ueki" <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:04 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote: > > > Name: Makoto Ueki > Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com > Affiliation: JIS Working Group > Document: W2 > Item Number: Appendix A: Glossary > Part of Item: > Comment Type: question > Summary of Issue: large scale text for CJK > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > In "large scale (text)", it reads "... font size that would yield equivalent stroke width for Chinese, Japanese and Korean (CJK) fonts". For Japanese, the stroke width differs according to the font face, also between Kanji and Hiragana/Katakana. And the stroke width is not proportional to the font size. > > Proposed Change: > We can't determine the large scale text for Japanese characters with this definition. Please tell us how to find appropriate font size for Japanese. To be testable, we have to present the font sizes like "18 point or 14 point bold" for Japanese authors. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ We determined the font sizes for this provision by using the standard font sizes for large print in the United States. We suggest that the font sizes for CJK languages be derived in the same fashion. If you have a suggestion for a specific font size that would be suitable for large print in CJK languages, we would welcome any input you might have. We have added the following note to the definition: NOTE 5: The 18 and 14 point sizes for roman texts are taken from the minimum size for large print (14pt) and the larger standard font size (18pt). For other fonts such as CJK languages the "equivalent" sizes would the the minimum large print size used for those languages and the next larger standard large print size. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 01:49:10 UTC