- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:45:42 -0700
- To: noreply@w3.org
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:54 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote: > > > Name: Makoto Ueki > Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com > Affiliation: JIS Working Group > Document: W2 > Item Number: Appendix A: Glossary > Part of Item: > Comment Type: question > Summary of Issue: 18 point or 14 point bold > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > What is "common pixel sizes available today"? 1024 x 768? > > Proposed Change: > We need more concrete premise for the users display. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Since the note relates to the definition of large scale text, we have removed this sentence "This success criterion is based on common pixel sizes available today." Additional detail about why 14 point bold and 18 point were chosen can be found in the understanding 1.4.3 and 1.4.6 documents. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 01:46:32 UTC