W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > October 2008

Re: definition of "process"

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:56:59 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0810052156x65d4e235n6fd1255d9873f9e4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Makoto Ueki" <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:19 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote:
> Name: Makoto Ueki
> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> Affiliation: JIS Working Group
> Document: W2
> Item Number: Appendix A: Glossary
> Part of Item:
> Comment Type: editorial
> Summary of Issue: definition of "process"
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> It reads "series of user actions where each action is required in order to complete an activity". Can we remove "where action is required" and say "series of user actions in order to complete an activity"?
> Proposed Change:
> If it would change the meaning, just keep it as it is.

Response from the Working Group
Removing this phrase would change the meaning of the term. This is
because it specifies that "each action" is required in order to
complete an activity. For example, a process would require that a user
complete each of the following actions:
 1. add an item to their shopping cart
 2. provide a shipping address
 3. provide payment information
 4. review and submit their order

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact

On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Monday, 6 October 2008 04:57:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:14:50 UTC