Monday, 30 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: BIG APOLOGY re: PEP & revised PEP status
Saturday, 28 September 1996
Friday, 27 September 1996
- Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
- Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
- Re: safe reload POST?
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: safe reload POST?
- Re: safe reload POST?
Thursday, 26 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: safe reload POST?
- Re: wording nits: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- wording nits: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: Apache and cookies
- Re: safe reload POST?
- Re: Apache and cookies
- Re: Apache and cookies
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Idempotence
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Apache and cookies
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Idempotence
- Re: safe reload POST?
- BIG APOLOGY re: PEP & revised PEP status
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: safe reload POST?
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
Wednesday, 25 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: safe reload POST?
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- safe reload POST?
- meeting at Dec 9-13 IETF in San Jose?
Tuesday, 24 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
- Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
- HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
Monday, 23 September 1996
Sunday, 22 September 1996
Friday, 20 September 1996
Thursday, 19 September 1996
- Re: Comments on new conneg draft
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- RE: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- Re: idempotence of POST
- idempotence of POST
Wednesday, 18 September 1996
Tuesday, 17 September 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- new digest-authentication internet draft submitted
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
Monday, 16 September 1996
- Re: Comments on new conneg draft
- Call for Papers - Global Internet - IEEE Communications Magazine
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
Sunday, 15 September 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
Saturday, 14 September 1996
- HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
- Conversion Program
- Opinions on Editorial Revisions to Digest Authentication Spec
Friday, 13 September 1996
Thursday, 12 September 1996
- Distributed Authoring Requirements Draft
- Comments on new conneg draft
- Re: Authenticated Transactions: Why Wait Another Year?
- Re: Editorial Revisions to Digest Authentication Spec
Wednesday, 11 September 1996
Tuesday, 10 September 1996
- I-D ACTION:draft-holtman-http-negotiation-03.txt
- Re: Authenticated Transactions: Why Wait Another Year?
Monday, 9 September 1996
Saturday, 7 September 1996
Friday, 6 September 1996
- Re: Handling ambiguous requests
- Re: Handling ambiguous requests
- PEP name space collisions
- PEP conflicting semantics
- Content negotiation draft 03 available
- Handling ambiguous requests
- Re: Handling ambiguous requests
- Re: Handling ambiguous requests
Thursday, 5 September 1996
- Handling ambiguous requests
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
Wednesday, 4 September 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: HTTP working group status
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- HTTP working group status
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
Tuesday, 3 September 1996
Friday, 30 August 1996
- Re: Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Protocol Action: A Proposed Extension to HTTP : Digest Access Authentication to Proposed Standard
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Protocol Action: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 to Proposed Standard
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
- resolution of digest issue
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Small Detail on Chunked Encoding
- Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
Thursday, 29 August 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
- Digest Auth (fwd)
Wednesday, 28 August 1996
- Re: digest vs basic
- Re: digest vs basic
- Re: digest vs basic
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Syntax and sticky/compressed headers.
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
Tuesday, 27 August 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- image transfer?
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: Netscape vs. Digest
- Syntax and sticky/compressed headers.
- Netscape vs. Digest (?)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- HTTP/1.1 + Digest
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
Sunday, 25 August 1996
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
- [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
Sunday, 25 August 1996
Friday, 23 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
- Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
- Re: Feature tag registration
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
Wednesday, 21 August 1996
- Re: Feature tag registration
- Re: HTTP/1.1, queries, and redirect
- HTTP/1.1, queries, and redirect
- Feature tag registration
- Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
Tuesday, 20 August 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Hyphens and under bars
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Hyphens and under bars
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-pep-00.txt
- Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
- Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
- Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
Monday, 19 August 1996
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
- Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- draft-jepi-uppflow-00
- draft-ietf-http-pep-02
- Re: HTTP 1.1: Horse out of the barn
- HTTP 1.1: Horse out of the barn
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- (revised) HTTP working group status
- Re: 201 created on PUT Method etc
- Lynx as a HTTP/1.0 application (was Re: Call for compatibility testers)
- Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
Sunday, 18 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: 201 created on PUT Method etc
- [johnh@isi.edu: document about P-HTTP/TCP interactions]
- 201 created on PUT Method etc
- When to send HTTP/1.1
- Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
Saturday, 17 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
Friday, 16 August 1996
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- When to make objects uncacheable ?
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07.txt, .ps
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
Thursday, 15 August 1996
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
Saturday, 15 June 1996
Thursday, 15 August 1996
- HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
- POPUP WINDOW
- I-D ACTION:draft-holtman-http-negotiation-02.txt
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
Wednesday, 14 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Am I a ghost?
- Submission of draft-holtman-http-negotiation-02.txt
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- drafts please
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: HTTP State Management Mechanism draft question
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Entity Tags
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07.txt
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
Monday, 12 August 1996
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- web directory listing
- HTTP State Management Mechanism draft question
- RE: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Next draft of HTTP/1.1 spec...
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Non-numeric feature tags
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- RE: Entity Tags
- Entity Tags
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
Sunday, 11 August 1996
Saturday, 10 August 1996
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
- Re: Meta data in anchors..
- Re: these results sound very encouraging
- Re: Sticky stuff.
Friday, 9 August 1996
Saturday, 10 August 1996
Friday, 9 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- RE: Sticky stuff.
- RE: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Next draft of HTTP/1.1 spec...
- RE: useful document identification (was encouraging....)
- Re: Statistics on reusing request headers in persistent connections (repost)
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- Re: useful document identification (was encouraging....)
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- RE: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Call for compatibility testers
- Re: Statistics on reusing request headers in persistent connections (repost)
- Re: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
Thursday, 8 August 1996
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Statistics on reusing request headers in persistent connections (repost)
- RE: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Re: Sticky stuff.
- Sticky stuff.
- Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
- RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
- Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
- RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
Tuesday, 9 August 1994
Thursday, 8 August 1996
- Re: Beyond 1.1
- Beyond 1.1
- Call for compatibility testers
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: Meta data in anchors..
- Re: Questions about i18n support in HTTP
- Re: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
Wednesday, 7 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
- RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft --as an attachment)
- RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- RE: Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- useful document identification (was encouraging....)
- RE: Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
- Re: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Re: Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- RE: hit-metering poll
- Re: hit-metering poll
- Meta data in anchors..
- RE: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
- Questions about i18n support in HTTP
- Re: Apache Cookie Log Analyzer (was: Re: hit-metering poll)
- Apache Cookie Log Analyzer (was: Re: hit-metering poll)
- Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
- Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
- Re: Last Call: Proposed HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- another content-negotiation script
- Re: hit-metering poll
Tuesday, 6 August 1996
- Re: Last Call: Proposed HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
- Re: hit-metering poll
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- hit-metering poll
- Last Call: Proposed HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
- (no subject)
- draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: these results sound very encouraging
- these results sound very encouraging
Monday, 5 August 1996
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Sticky headers and multiplexing (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Content negotiation implementations available
- Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
- Re: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
- Re: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
- Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
Sunday, 4 August 1996
Saturday, 3 August 1996
Friday, 2 August 1996
Thursday, 1 August 1996
- RE: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Authentication issue
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- Server-side rendering engines
- Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
- New document on "HTTP/1.2 extension protocol" SOON
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
Wednesday, 31 July 1996
- New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
- draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
Tuesday, 30 July 1996
Monday, 29 July 1996
Sunday, 28 July 1996
Wednesday, 24 July 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
- HTTP/1.1 draft 6, minor EDIT
- Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
- Re: Please publish draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt as an Internet Standard
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
- Re: HTTP 1.1, rev 6 comments
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
Tuesday, 23 July 1996
- HTTP 1.1, rev 6 comments
- draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-06
- Re: Please publish draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt as an Internet Standard
- Please publish draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt as an Internet Standard
- http-state-mgmt-03.txt changes
Monday, 22 July 1996
- Re: Vary and Accept-Language
- Re: Vary and Accept-Language
- Vary and Accept-Language
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
Sunday, 21 July 1996
Saturday, 20 July 1996
Friday, 19 July 1996
- Re: The Title header
- Re: The Title header
- Re: The Title header
- Re: The Title header
- Re: The Title header
- RE: The Title header
- Re: The Title header
Wednesday, 17 July 1996
Tuesday, 16 July 1996
- RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
- RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
- RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
- Re: Is referer spelled wrong?
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
- Re: Is referer spelled wrong?
- Re: Is referer spelled wrong?
- RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
- RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
- RE: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
- Re: Language negotiation and robots
- Re: Minor issues with HTTP 1.1 draft 6
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
Monday, 15 July 1996
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
- Minor issues with HTTP 1.1 draft 6
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
Sunday, 14 July 1996
Saturday, 13 July 1996
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
- Any interest in automatic link-updating?
- Re: Remapping charsets
- Re: Starting HTTP-NG
- Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
Friday, 12 July 1996
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- Starting HTTP-NG
- HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: chopping list
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: short names for headers
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
Thursday, 11 July 1996
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
- Re: Remapping charsets
- chopping list
- Re: Demographics
- RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- RE: Demographics
- Remapping charsets
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: Demographics
- Re: short names for headers
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: short names for headers
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
Wednesday, 10 July 1996
- RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- RE: Demographics
- Re: Demographics
- RE: Demographics
- RE: short names for headers
- short names for headers
- RE: Demographics
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-06.txt, .ps
- Re: Demographics
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: Demographics
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: Demographics
- Re: Demographics
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
Tuesday, 9 July 1996
- RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Demographics
- multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
- Draft 06 submitted to internet drafts directory.
Monday, 8 July 1996
- Last Call: A Proposed Extension to HTTP : Digest Access Authentication to Proposed Standard
- charset bugs (was: proposed HTTP changes for charset)
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
- "charset" issue is closed in HTTP-WG
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: If-Range Question
Sunday, 7 July 1996
- Re: If-Range Question
- If-Range Question
- Strange proxy behavior
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
Saturday, 6 July 1996
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
- Re: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
Friday, 5 July 1996
- RE: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
- Re: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
- Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- RE: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
Thursday, 4 July 1996
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: re-revised last last words
Wednesday, 3 July 1996
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- re-revised last last words
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Minor fixes to draft 05
- Re: MIME and Warning header syntax
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- RE: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- MIME and Warning header syntax
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Please publish draft-ietf-http-digest-aa-04.txt as an Internet Standard
- minutes, HTTP Working Group, IETF June 96, Montreal
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
- proposed HTTP changes for charset