- From: Joseph Arceneaux <jla@arceneaux.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 96 17:08 PDT
- To: dwm@shell.portal.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 15:02:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "David W. Morris" <dwm@shell.portal.com> b. I have a shipping product which includes a built in reference to an unrelated external site. This product will make thousands of users into micro-web servers w/o any ability to deal with any form of automatic notification. I only offer this as the penultimate example of difficulty which needs to be considered (and makes me think our maintenance release should have a way to deal with broken imbeded links...) Dave Morris I don't see link update as neccessarily part of the protocol, except perhaps for requiring more strict adherrence to providing certain headers (e.g., the "Last-Modified" field). My online product consists of a large database of URLs. Part of my offering is alerting customers to movement or change in the link targets. To do this, I batch run some custom link-verification code. This works pretty well. Joe ---- Joseph Arceneaux Arceneaux Consulting http://www.arceneaux.com jla@arceneaux.com +1 415 648 9988 (direct) +1 415 341 1395 (fax) +1 500 488 9308
Received on Monday, 15 July 1996 17:17:32 UTC