- From: Joseph Arceneaux <jla@arceneaux.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 96 17:08 PDT
- To: dwm@shell.portal.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 15:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David W. Morris" <dwm@shell.portal.com>
b. I have a shipping product which includes a built in reference to
an unrelated external site. This product will make thousands of
users into micro-web servers w/o any ability to deal with any form
of automatic notification. I only offer this as the penultimate
example of difficulty which needs to be considered (and makes me
think our maintenance release should have a way to deal with
broken imbeded links...)
Dave Morris
I don't see link update as neccessarily part of the protocol, except
perhaps for requiring more strict adherrence to providing certain
headers (e.g., the "Last-Modified" field).
My online product consists of a large database of URLs. Part of my
offering is alerting customers to movement or change in the link
targets. To do this, I batch run some custom link-verification code.
This works pretty well.
Joe
----
Joseph Arceneaux
Arceneaux Consulting
http://www.arceneaux.com
jla@arceneaux.com
+1 415 648 9988 (direct)
+1 415 341 1395 (fax)
+1 500 488 9308
Received on Monday, 15 July 1996 17:17:32 UTC