- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 96 09:37:09 EDT
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
"David W. Morris" <dwm@shell.portal.com> wrote: > A nit, but it seems strange to call the 'rfc' "Proposed HTTP State > Management Mechanism" ... isn't "HTTP State Management Mechanism" > closer to the correct "message"? That's an administrative error on my part. The actual document (draft 03) has elided "Proposed", but I forgot to tell the IETF staff to change their record of the title. Because previous drafts said "Proposed...", that's what the announcement for this one said. I'll tell IETF today. Dave Kristol
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 1996 06:44:19 UTC