- From: <hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 96 18:38:25 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Cc: hallam@ai.mit.edu, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, hallam@vesuvius.ai.mit.edu
>Basically, "docking" isn't practical. I don't think the HTTP editor >(Jim) is prepared to do the rather major editing that would be >necessary to make the merged document readable, I know that the RFC >editor isn't, and I don't think that we can do that much editing >without recycling through "last call". Ah, I misunderstood your question which sounded like you were asking about docking. My understanding of the wording in the spec was that the group were generally agreed that incorporating digest was a good idea but that it might be controvertial vis a vis the IESG and hence the conditional statement... At all costs we must avoid going back to last call (IETF snakes and ladders, your draft has a misprint go back to square 1) PHILL
Received on Monday, 26 August 1996 15:47:58 UTC