w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from February 1997: by thread

Current Markup Language Example Len Bullard (Thursday, 27 February)
Call for participants: WWW6 workshop Jon Bosak (Wednesday, 26 February)
testing Gregory Murphy (Monday, 24 February)
ERB decisions on linking element recognition Tim Bray (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: ERB decisions on linking element recognition len bullard (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: ERB decisions on linking element recognition Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: ERB decisions on linking element recognition Gavin Nicol (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: ERB decisions on linking element recognition Steven J. DeRose (Tuesday, 25 February)
  - Re: ERB decisions on linking element recognition Len Bullard (Tuesday, 25 February)
  - Re: ERB decisions on linking element recognition Gavin Nicol (Tuesday, 25 February)
Pardon my stupidity Tim Bray (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: Pardon my stupidity Joe English (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: Pardon my stupidity Jon Bosak (Monday, 24 February)
Parameter entities allowed anywhere ? Norbert H. MIKULA (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: Parameter entities allowed anywhere ? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 26 February)
  - Re: Parameter entities allowed anywhere ? Norbert H. MIKULA (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Parameter entities allowed anywhere ? Peter Murray-Rust (Thursday, 27 February)
Suggested new XML slogan Tim Bray (Sunday, 23 February)
Normative refs to 8879/10744? Tim Bray (Sunday, 23 February)
- Re: Normative refs to 8879/10744? len bullard (Sunday, 23 February)
Re: XML FAQ v0.4 lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)
XML FAQ v0.4 Peter Flynn (Saturday, 22 February)
WWW6 structured doc demo Jon Bosak (Saturday, 22 February)
New list: XML-DEV Jon Bosak (Saturday, 22 February)
Re: 3.2.a Name for generalized multilink lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)
Re: 3.2 c-d Content of linking elements? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)
Re: 3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)
In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Steve Pepper (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? David Durand (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Steve Pepper (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Sam Hunting (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Steve Pepper (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 25 February)
3.a List link required? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.a List link required? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 3.a List link required? Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
3.2 c-d Content of linking elements? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2 c-d Content of linking elements? Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2 c-d Content of linking elements? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Steven J. DeRose (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? David Durand (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Dave Hollander (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Joe English (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
3.2.a Name for generalized multilink Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.2.a Name for generalized multilink Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
  - xlink, not multilink or xml-link Sam Hunting (Sunday, 23 February)
    - Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link Jon Bosak (Sunday, 23 February)
    - Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link Tim Bray (Sunday, 23 February)
    - Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link Sam Hunting (Monday, 24 February)
    - Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link Tim Bray (Monday, 24 February)
    - Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link Jon Bosak (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: 3.2.a Name for generalized multilink Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
3.1.i exclude other information? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.i exclude other information? Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.i exclude other information? Digitome Ltd. (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.i exclude other information? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 3.1.i exclude other information? Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
3.1 b-h: Link contents question matrix Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1 b-h: Link contents question matrix Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1 b-h: Link contents question matrix Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 3.1 b-h: Link contents question matrix Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Peter Flynn (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Gavin Nicol (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Steven J. DeRose (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? David Durand (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Digitome Ltd. (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
Loss of information going from SGML to XML James Clark (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Bill Smith (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Dave Hollander (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Dave Hollander (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML streich@austin.sar.slb.com (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Peter Flynn (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Loss of information going from SGML to XML Peter Murray-Rust (Friday, 21 February)
DRAFT: Summary of ERB conference call Steven J. DeRose (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: DRAFT: Summary of ERB conference call Paul Grosso (Thursday, 20 February)
SDATA [was: Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation] lee@sq.com (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SDATA [was: Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation] Robert Streich (Friday, 21 February)
SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Murray-Rust (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Flynn (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Thursday, 20 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Len Bullard (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Murray-Rust (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation lee@sq.com (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Flynn (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Digitome Ltd. (Thursday, 20 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation len bullard (Thursday, 20 February)
    - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Jon Bosak (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation len bullard (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation David Durand (Thursday, 20 February)
    - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation len bullard (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Robert Streich (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Robert Streich (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation David Durand (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Flynn (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Steven J. DeRose (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Steven J. DeRose (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Henry S. Thompson (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Bill Smith (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation len bullard (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Dave Peterson (Sunday, 23 February)
  - Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation len bullard (Sunday, 23 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Flynn (Sunday, 23 February)
- Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation Jon Bosak (Sunday, 23 February)
Re: implementation comments Peter Murray-Rust (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: implementation comments Peter Flynn (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: implementation comments James David Mason (Thursday, 20 February)
  - Re: implementation comments Deborah A. Lapeyre (Thursday, 20 February)
    - Re: implementation comments Len Bullard (Thursday, 20 February)
Mailing list broken? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: Mailing list broken? Jon Bosak (Wednesday, 19 February)
6. Addressing & process model issues Tim Bray (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues Peter Flynn (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
  - Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
    - Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues Gavin Nicol (Monday, 24 February)
    - Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
Java-based XML browser and implementation comments Peter Murray-Rust (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: Java-based XML browser and implementation comments Len Bullard (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Java-based XML browser and implementation comments Tony Graham (Wednesday, 19 February)
  - Re: Java-based XML browser and implementation comments Peter Flynn (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? [Accessibility] Harvey Bingham (Wednesday, 19 February)
XML FAQ: some questions Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: XML FAQ: some questions Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Tuesday, 18 February)
  - Re: XML FAQ: some questions Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 18 February)
re 6.2 Terry Allen (Monday, 17 February)
6. Addressing & process model issues Tim Bray (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 18 February)
Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: 2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)
Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Paul Grosso (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Joe English (Tuesday, 18 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Paul Prescod (Tuesday, 18 February)
ERB terminology votes Tim Bray (Saturday, 15 February)
- Re: ERB terminology votes Peter Flynn (Monday, 17 February)
If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . Terry Allen (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . len bullard (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . Terry Allen (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 13 February)
2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? Martin Bryan (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? Peter Flynn (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? David Durand (Wednesday, 19 February)
2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Martin Bryan (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Hasse Haitto (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Paul Grosso (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? David Durand (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Peter Flynn (Wednesday, 19 February)
2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI? len bullard (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI? Martin Bryan (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: 2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI? David Durand (Wednesday, 19 February)
2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Gavin Nicol (Thursday, 13 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Martin Bryan (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Digitome Ltd. (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Jon Bosak (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Murray Altheim (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Tim Bray (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Jon Bosak (Thursday, 13 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Christopher R. Maden (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Martin Bryan (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Bill Smith (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Murray Altheim (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Jon Bosak (Thursday, 13 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Eve L. Maler (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Martin Bryan (Friday, 14 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Digitome Ltd. (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Murray Altheim (Friday, 14 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Murray Altheim (Friday, 14 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Monday, 17 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? David Durand (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? David Durand (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Peter Flynn (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? David Durand (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Sam Hunting (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Christopher R. Maden (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? David Durand (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Peter Flynn (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Friday, 21 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Len Bullard (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Friday, 21 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Saturday, 22 February)
    - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Jon Bosak (Sunday, 23 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Len Bullard (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? lee@sq.com (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Peter Flynn (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Peter Flynn (Saturday, 22 February)
  - Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? len bullard (Saturday, 22 February)
ERB meeting of Feb. 12th Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)
Improved, slightly modified version of my proposed redraft Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Improved, slightly modified version of my proposed redraft Martin Bryan (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: Improved, slightly modified version of my proposed redraft Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 13 February)
Winning battles but losing the war Henry S. Thompson (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: Winning battles but losing the war Murray Maloney (Wednesday, 12 February)
  - Re: Winning battles but losing the war len bullard (Wednesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Winning battles but losing the war Jon Bosak (Wednesday, 12 February)
    - Re: Winning battles but losing the war Todd Freter (Thursday, 13 February)
    - Re: Winning battles but losing the war Jon Bosak (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: Winning battles but losing the war Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: Winning battles but losing the war Keith M. Corbett (Thursday, 13 February)
  - Re: Winning battles but losing the war Alex Milowski (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: Winning battles but losing the war Murray Altheim (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: Winning battles but losing the war Peter Flynn (Saturday, 15 February)
- Re: Winning battles but losing the war Peter Flynn (Saturday, 15 February)
XML process modelling [was No Metadocuments] Terry Allen (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML process modelling [was No Metadocuments] Alex Milowski (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML process modelling [was No Metadocuments] Dave Peterson (Wednesday, 12 February)
What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Tim Bray (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)
- RE: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Kurt Conrad (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Joe English (Tuesday, 11 February)
- RE: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Dave Peterson (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Friday, 14 February)
- RE: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Ken Holman (Monday, 17 February)
- RE: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Dave Peterson (Monday, 17 February)
- RE: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Hasse Haitto (Tuesday, 18 February)
- RE: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Hasse Haitto (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 18 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Joe English (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Tuesday, 18 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Paul Prescod (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Steven J. DeRose (Wednesday, 19 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? David Durand (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Paul Grosso (Wednesday, 19 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Paul Prescod (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Dave Peterson (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Wednesday, 19 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Len Bullard (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Wednesday, 19 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? len bullard (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Wednesday, 19 February)
  - Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Joe English (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Peter Flynn (Friday, 21 February)
The new perspective I'm pushing, continued Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)
re: get rid of leading hyphen Lou Burnard (Tuesday, 11 February)
Ontology and Epistimology for Links in XHL Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Ontology and Epistimology for Links in XHL Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 11 February)
XML FAQ Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML FAQ Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 15 February)
Marketing Contributions... Digitome Ltd. (Tuesday, 11 February)
- RE: Marketing Contributions... Kurt Conrad (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Marketing Contributions... Steve Pepper (Thursday, 13 February)
XML FAQ Peter Flynn (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML FAQ Jon Bosak (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: XML FAQ Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)
There Are No Metadocuments Terry Allen (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Bill Smith (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Terry Allen (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Peter Murray-Rust (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: There Are No Metadocuments len bullard (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: There Are No Metadocuments Jon Bosak (Monday, 10 February)
    - Re: There Are No Metadocuments Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)
    - Re: There Are No Metadocuments Gavin Nicol (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Murray Altheim (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Dave Peterson (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: There Are No Metadocuments len bullard (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Terry Allen (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Dave Peterson (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Lou Burnard (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments David Durand (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments David Durand (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: There Are No Metadocuments Gavin Nicol (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Alex Milowski (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Steven J. DeRose (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: There Are No Metadocuments Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 11 February)
Re: "Natural XML" John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Sunday, 9 February)
Re "Natural XML" Terry Allen (Sunday, 9 February)
Re: XML catalog draft (Please let's not argue resolution independence again!) David Durand (Sunday, 9 February)
The Unoptimized SGML-Bundle Relations Schema for MIME Terry Allen (Sunday, 9 February)
Re: Alex's JAR documents [was: XML catalog draft] lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
Re: Get rid of the leading hyphen! lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
XML marketing contributions Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML marketing contributions Kurt Conrad (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML marketing contributions Peter Flynn (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML marketing contributions Liora Alschuler (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: XML marketing contributions Todd Freter (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML marketing contributions Bill Smith (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML marketing contributions Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)
Get rid of the leading hyphen! Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: Get rid of the leading hyphen! Murray Altheim (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: Get rid of the leading hyphen! Len Bullard (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Get rid of the leading hyphen! Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Get rid of the leading hyphen! Peter Murray-Rust (Tuesday, 11 February)
Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Jon Bosak (Saturday, 8 February)
  - Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? len bullard (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Peter Murray-Rust (Sunday, 9 February)
  - Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Murray Altheim (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Jon Bosak (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 11 February)
1.4 h: Explainer? Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? James David Mason (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Len Bullard (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Friday, 7 February)
    - Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Len Bullard (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Martin Bryan (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Jon Bosak (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? David Durand (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? David Durand (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Liora Alschuler (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Len Bullard (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.4 h: Explainer? Steven J. DeRose (Monday, 10 February)
List of markup declaration constraints in XML (fwd) Peter Flynn (Thursday, 6 February)
elm alternate linking proposal Eve L. Maler (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: elm alternate linking proposal Tim Bray (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: elm alternate linking proposal Eve L. Maler (Friday, 7 February)
Re: Section 0: Naming -- not limited to XML? lee@sq.com (Tuesday, 4 February)
Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) David G. Durand (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Len Bullard (Tuesday, 4 February)
Revised text for Section 5 of XHL Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 4 February)
Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Harvey Bingham (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Gregory Murphy (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology David G. Durand (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology lee@sq.com (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Martin Bryan (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Martin Bryan (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology lee@sq.com (Wednesday, 5 February)
Re: Section 0: Naming Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Jon Bosak (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming David G. Durand (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Digitome Ltd. (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Eve L. Maler (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: Section 0: Naming Len Bullard (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: Section 0: Naming Todd Freter (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: Section 0: Naming len bullard (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: Section 0: Naming Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: Section 0: Naming Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Tim Bray (Tuesday, 4 February)
  - Re: Section 0: Naming Len Bullard (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming David Durand (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Eve L. Maler (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming Liora Alschuler (Thursday, 6 February)
  - Re: Section 0: Naming Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: Section 0: Naming lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
[Fwd: Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue?] Len Bullard (Monday, 3 February)
NXP Update (V 0.9) released Norbert H. MIKULA (Monday, 3 February)
Re: 1.a: (David's Archform declaration gloss) David G. Durand (Monday, 3 February)
Syntax of PIs Peter Murray-Rust (Monday, 3 February)
Re: Sample Question Peter Flynn (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Sample Question Len Bullard (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Sample Question Peter Flynn (Monday, 3 February)
Re: Subject headings -- and multiple CCs David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
Re: 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete? Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete? Steven J. DeRose (Monday, 10 February)
Re: 1.1.a Formatting Issues Out of Scope? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.1.a Formatting Issues Out of Scope? Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
Re: 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)
Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal? Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
  - Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal? Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal? David G. Durand (Tuesday, 4 February)
Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends James Clark (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Len Bullard (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Jon Bosak (Friday, 7 February)
    - Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends len bullard (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends lee@sq.com (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends lee@sq.com (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends len bullard (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends David Durand (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Tim Bray (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends David Durand (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Steven J. DeRose (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends Liora Alschuler (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: 1.b: Excluded relationships David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
Re: 1.4 d: Address terminology -- Another possible ambiguity. David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! lee@sq.com (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! Eve L. Maler (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! lee@sq.com (Sunday, 2 February)
  - Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! Eve Maler (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! lee@sq.com (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! Eve L. Maler (Monday, 3 February)
Re: text/xml volunteers needed [SHORTTAG] lee@sq.com (Saturday, 1 February)
Discussions foreground and background Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)
XML and DSSSL at WWW6 Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)
Current SGML ERB/WG roster Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)
New members; archives updated Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)
Re: text/xml volunteers needed Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: text/xml volunteers needed lee@sq.com (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: text/xml volunteers needed Dave Peterson (Saturday, 1 February)
Re: XML catalog draft Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Christopher R. Maden (Monday, 3 February)
  - Initial draft of XML-Link spec now availab Len Bullard (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Paul Grosso (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft James Clark (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Martin Bryan (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Terry Allen (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Jon Bosak (Friday, 7 February)
    - Re: XML catalog draft Gavin Nicol (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Paul Grosso (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Saturday, 8 February)
    - Reference Implementation (Was: Re: XML catalog draft) len bullard (Saturday, 8 February)
    - Re: Reference Implementation (Was: Re: XML catalog draft) Paul Prescod (Sunday, 9 February)
    - Re: Reference Implementation (Was: Re: XML catalog draft) len bullard (Sunday, 9 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Alex Milowski (Sunday, 9 February)
    - Re: XML catalog draft Gavin Nicol (Monday, 10 February)
    - Re: XML catalog draft Alex Milowski (Monday, 10 February)
    - Re: XML catalog draft Gavin Nicol (Monday, 10 February)
    - Re: XML catalog draft Alex Milowski (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Gavin Nicol (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Murray Altheim (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft len bullard (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Jon Bosak (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Gavin Nicol (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 8 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Saturday, 8 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Saturday, 8 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Martin Bryan (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Paul Grosso (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Paul Grosso (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Sunday, 9 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft W. Eliot Kimber (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Terry Allen (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Martin Bryan (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Tim Bray (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Paul Prescod (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Tim Bray (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft David Durand (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft David Durand (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Steven J. DeRose (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Steven J. DeRose (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Hasse Haitto (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft David Durand (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)
  - Re: XML catalog draft Jon Bosak (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Peter Flynn (Sunday, 16 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Peter Flynn (Sunday, 16 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Peter Flynn (Sunday, 16 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Michael Sperberg-McQueen (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Terry Allen (Monday, 17 February)
Re: 1.4 d: Address terminology Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.4 d: Address terminology Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.4 d: Address terminology Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)
Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Eve L. Maler (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology lee@sq.com (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Murray Altheim (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)
  - Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Jon Bosak (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Steven J. DeRose (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Steven J. DeRose (Monday, 10 February)
Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
  - Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) len bullard (Monday, 3 February)
    - Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Len Bullard (Tuesday, 4 February)
    - Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Jon Bosak (Tuesday, 4 February)
Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)
    - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Henry S. Thompson (Monday, 10 February)
    - 1.2 link and 1.6 traversal Henry S. Thompson (Monday, 10 February)
    - Re: 1.2 link and 1.6 traversal Len Bullard (Monday, 10 February)
    - Re: 1.2 link and 1.6 traversal Jon Bosak (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Martin Bryan (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Len Bullard (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? lee@sq.com (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Len Bullard (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Jon Bosak (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Murray Altheim (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Peter Murray-Rust (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? David Durand (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? David Durand (Monday, 10 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? len bullard (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? David Durand (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Steven J. DeRose (Tuesday, 11 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? len bullard (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Martin Bryan (Wednesday, 12 February)
  - Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Jon Bosak (Saturday, 15 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? David Durand (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Peter Flynn (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Martin Bryan (Monday, 24 February)
Re: 1.a: Use Elements? Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements? Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)
Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: XML catalog draft Paul Grosso (Monday, 3 February)
Re: Production 21 (and others) lee@sq.com (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: Production 21 (and others) Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: Production 21 (and others) Peter Flynn (Monday, 3 February)

w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from February 1997 by thread