- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 19:22:01 -0600
- To: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Jon Bosak wrote: > > [Liora Alschuler:] > > | Is there a reason why we can't just call these "direct" and "indirect" > | links? > > I agree with Liora. These work very well intuitively and are about as > apropos as anything else that's been suggested. They are functional labels and do not indicate function. So, no, not intuitive. Why not use independent link and context link? They are standard and a large segment of the SGML community recognizes them? len
Received on Friday, 7 February 1997 20:22:01 UTC