W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 09:42:59 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970224094102.009b7100@pop.intergate.bc.ca>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org

At 11:07 AM 2/24/97 -0500, Sam Hunting wrote:
>> >Why not just "xlink"? 
> As Jon points out, it needs to begin with "XML-"

Irrelevant; xlink still works.  It's going to have to be XML-something;
the spec currently uses XML-MLINK, and in the prose we say multilink.
So it could be XML-XLINK and "extended link".  I still like it. -T.

Received on Monday, 24 February 1997 12:49:22 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Len Bullard: "Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute?"
Previous message: Len Bullard: "Re: 6. Addressing & process model issues"
Maybe in reply to: Sam Hunting: "xlink, not multilink or xml-link"
Next in thread: Jon Bosak: "Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link"
Reply: Jon Bosak: "Re: xlink, not multilink or xml-link"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:05 EDT