> > I suspect Dan would argue with that proposition; I'm fairly sure TBL would > if pinned down. Nobody on W3C staff said a kind word for XML when I and > others brought it up. XML was not given air time; or rather it was listed > on the agenda but time ran out during the final "quiz the staff" session. > > I hope next year someone from the SGML ERB will be given an hour to present > the glowing success story. But we'll have to get XML far up the pipeline in > the W3C process for that to happen; that pipeline is clogged, and if XML > doesn't burst loose in Santa Clara it might not get another chance this > year. (I wish I could be there.) > In addition, has anyone noticed that XML *doesn't* show up on the main web document at http://www.w3.org. You have to dig down in the SGML link to find XML. It would be a great benefit to have an XML link since we do have a 1.0 *standard*. ============================================================================== R. Alexander Milowski http://www.copsol.com/ alex@copsol.com Copernican Solutions Incorporated (612) 379 - 3608Received on Thursday, 13 February 1997 14:04:46 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:04 EDT